2002 · CON

Final

Titans

Tennessee

QB Steve McNair

24·41

Raiders

Oakland

QB Rich Gannon

Network Associates Coliseum · outdoors · grass · 52°F · wind 9mph

Closing spread

OAK -9

Total

46

Model margin

-0.1est.

OAK perspective

Push chance

1.1%est.

Win probability

  • Raiders
  • Titans

How each play moved the game.

Raiders winsTitans wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

All square 8–8 since 1999

Meetings average 46.7 points. OAK are 9-7 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W6TEN @ LV10–20RAIDERS
2022 · W3LV @ TEN22–24TEN
2019 · W14TEN @ OAK42–21TEN
2017 · W1OAK @ TEN26–16RAIDERS
2016 · W3OAK @ TEN17–10RAIDERS
2015 · W12OAK @ TEN24–21RAIDERS
2013 · W12TEN @ OAK23–19TEN
2010 · W1OAK @ TEN13–38TEN

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultTEN–OAK
LVQ1 15:00769Touchdown0–7
TENQ1 10:59989Touchdown7–7
LVQ1 5:59895Touchdown7–14
TENQ1 2:471042Field goal10–14
LVQ2 12:39315Turnover10–14
TENQ2 11:443-1Punt10–14
LVQ2 9:4735Punt10–14
TENQ2 8:541252Touchdown17–14
LVQ2 2:4736Punt17–14
TENQ2 1:4725Turnover17–14
LVQ2 1:28216Touchdown17–21
TENQ2 1:0000Turnover17–21
LVQ2 0:49414Turnover17–24
TENQ3 15:00933Punt17–24
LVQ3 9:56841Punt17–24
TENQ3 6:514-1Turnover on downs17–24
LVQ3 5:2935Field goal17–27
TENQ3 4:29954Touchdown24–27
LVQ3 0:311046Touchdown24–34
TENQ4 11:2759Punt24–34
LVQ4 9:541164Touchdown24–41
TENQ4 3:251130Turnover on downs24–41
LVQ4 0:2900End of half24–41

Box score

Individual performances

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Steve McNair21/3619410

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Eddie George15674.50
Steve McNair55310.62

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +92.9%7.4%7.3%2.9%4.4%2.7%

Positive margins favour Raiders; negative favour Titans.

Half-point at risk

1.09%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

48.8%

Expected total

43.5est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.58
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-0.08
  • Expected margin-0.10

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.