2003 · Week 1

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Kordell Stewart

7·49

49ers

San Francisco

QB Jeff Garcia

3Com Park · outdoors · grass · 66°F · wind 16mph

Closing spread

SF -6.5

Total

40.5

Model margin

+4.1est.

SF perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • 49ers
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

49ers winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge map49ers
  • -0.100EPA / play+0.026
  • 38.3%Success rate43.9%
  • -0.156EPA / dropback+0.124
  • -0.016EPA / rush-0.099
  • 7.4%Explosive rate9.2%
  • 33.9%Third-down rate41.6%
  • 54.5%Red-zone TD rate48.9%
  • 1.44Points / drive1.83
  • 2.6%Turnover rate2.3%
  • -0.013EPA / play allowed-0.045

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

SF lead 9–8 since 1999

SF have won 2 straight. Meetings average 41.3 points. SF are 10-7 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W17CHI @ SF3842SF
2024 · W14CHI @ SF1338SF
2022 · W1SF @ CHI1019CHI
2021 · W8SF @ CHI3322SF
2018 · W16CHI @ SF149CHI
2017 · W13SF @ CHI1514SF
2016 · W13SF @ CHI626CHI
2015 · W13SF @ CHI2620SF

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kordell Stewart14/349513

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Kordell Stewart6213.50
Anthony Thomas6152.50
Adrian Peterson5122.40
Stanley Pritchett263.00
Marty Booker111.00

49ers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jeff Garcia19/3522921

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Kevan Barlow15624.10
Garrison Hearst11565.11
Jeff Garcia7365.11
Jamal Robertson691.50
Terrell Owens1-1-1.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +6.53.7%6.6%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour 49ers; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

4.88%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

60.1%

Expected total

45.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.55
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.12