2003 · Week 2 · Division

Final / OT

49ers

San Francisco

QB Jeff Garcia

24·27

Rams

St. Louis

QB Marc Bulger

Edward Jones Dome · dome · astroturf

Closing spread

STL -3

Total

47.5

Model margin

+2.2est.

STL perspective

Push chance

7.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Rams
  • 49ers

How each play moved the game.

Rams wins49ers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

SF lead 31–24–1 since 1999

Meetings average 43.4 points. STL are 23-31-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2026 · W1SF @ LA27–7SF
2025 · W10LA @ SF42–26RAMS
2025 · W5SF @ LA26–23SF
2024 · W15LA @ SF12–6RAMS
2024 · W3SF @ LA24–27RAMS
2023 · W18LA @ SF21–20RAMS
2023 · W2SF @ LA30–23SF
2022 · W8SF @ LA31–14SF

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultSF–STL
LAQ1 15:0030Punt0–0
SFQ1 14:39641Punt0–0
SFQ1 11:49116Touchdown7–0
LAQ1 11:44969Touchdown7–7
SFQ1 6:1638Punt7–7
LAQ1 4:113-2Punt7–7
SFQ1 3:13724Punt7–7
LAQ1 0:1736Punt7–7
SFQ2 14:06740Field goal10–7
LAQ2 8:451-8Turnover10–7
SFQ2 8:2730Missed field goal10–7
LAQ2 7:363-7Punt10–7
SFQ2 6:09641Turnover10–7
LAQ2 2:313-12Turnover10–7
SFQ2 1:47421Punt10–7
LAQ2 0:50421End of half10–7
SFQ3 15:0038Punt10–7
LAQ3 13:251293Touchdown10–14
SFQ3 6:391170Touchdown17–14
LAQ3 1:15866Touchdown17–21
SFQ4 13:1532Punt17–21
LAQ4 12:141425Field goal17–24
SFQ4 3:201190Touchdown24–24
LAQ4 0:1900Turnover24–24
SFQ4 0:13229Turnover24–24
LAOT327Field goal24–27

Box score

Individual performances

49ers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jeff Garcia19/3522221
Tim Rattay1/21500
Cedrick Wilson1/1600

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Garrison Hearst11898.10
Kevan Barlow11454.11
Jeff Garcia2147.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +34.0%2.7%7.0%7.5%3.1%4.7%3.0%

Positive margins favour Rams; negative favour 49ers.

Half-point at risk

7.51%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

54.9%

Expected total

45.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.38
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+2.18

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.