2003 · Week 4

Final

49ers

San Francisco

QB Jeff Garcia

7·35

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Gus Frerotte

Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome · dome · astroturf

Closing spread

PK

Total

43

Model margin

+3.4est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

1.8%est.

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • 49ers

How each play moved the game.

Vikings wins49ers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

49ersedge mapVikings
  • +0.026EPA / play+0.079
  • 43.9%Success rate45.9%
  • +0.124EPA / dropback+0.164
  • -0.099EPA / rush-0.044
  • 9.2%Explosive rate9.7%
  • 41.6%Third-down rate46.9%
  • 48.9%Red-zone TD rate62.7%
  • 1.83Points / drive1.96
  • 2.3%Turnover rate2.2%
  • -0.045EPA / play allowed-0.008

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 8–4 since 1999

MIN have won 2 straight. Meetings average 39.3 points. MIN are 7-5 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W2SF @ MIN1723MIN
2023 · W7SF @ MIN1722MIN
2021 · W12MIN @ SF2634SF
2019 · playoffsMIN @ SF1027SF
2018 · W1SF @ MIN1624MIN
2015 · W1MIN @ SF320SF
2012 · W3SF @ MIN1324MIN
2009 · W3SF @ MIN2427MIN

Box score

Individual performances

49ers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tim Rattay12/1814610
Jeff Garcia11/2310803

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Kevan Barlow11726.50
Garrison Hearst13564.30
Jeff Garcia11717.00

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Gus Frerotte16/2126740

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Moe Williams13433.30
Onterrio Smith10434.31
Jimmy Kleinsasser11212.00
Kelly Campbell166.00
Doug Chapman122.00
John Avery100.00
Gus Frerotte3-4-1.30

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line 03.8%6.8%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.8%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour 49ers.

Half-point at risk

1.82%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

58.3%

Expected total

46.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.87
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.43