2003 · Week 7 · Division

Final

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Kyle Boller

26·34

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Jon Kitna

Paul Brown Stadium · outdoors · grass · 63°F · wind 3mph

Closing spread

BAL -1

Total

36

Model margin

+0.8est.

CIN perspective

Push chance

2.1%est.

Win probability

  • Bengals
  • Ravens

How each play moved the game.

Bengals winsRavens wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Ravensedge mapBengals
  • -0.093EPA / play+0.049
  • 38.5%Success rate43.9%
  • -0.112EPA / dropback+0.126
  • -0.074EPA / rush-0.053
  • 9.7%Explosive rate7.6%
  • 31.7%Third-down rate44.6%
  • 53.9%Red-zone TD rate62.0%
  • 1.53Points / drive1.83
  • 3.5%Turnover rate1.9%
  • -0.194EPA / play allowed+0.077

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

BAL lead 30–25 since 1999

Meetings average 43 points. CIN are 28-25-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W15BAL @ CIN240BAL
2025 · W13CIN @ BAL3214CIN
2024 · W10CIN @ BAL3435BAL
2024 · W5BAL @ CIN4138BAL
2023 · W11CIN @ BAL2034BAL
2023 · W2BAL @ CIN2724BAL
2022 · playoffsBAL @ CIN1724CIN
2022 · W18BAL @ CIN1627CIN

Box score

Individual performances

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kyle Boller15/2730221

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jamal Lewis191015.30
Chester Taylor5102.01
Travis Taylor111.00
Kyle Boller4-2-0.50

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jon Kitna16/2727430

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Corey Dillon18392.21
Jon Kitna471.80
Brandon Bennett252.50
Rudi Johnson351.70
Peter Warrick133.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -14.3%2.9%7.3%7.4%3.0%4.5%2.8%

Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Ravens.

Half-point at risk

2.14%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

51.1%

Expected total

44.4est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.37
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential+0.56
  • Expected margin+0.75