2003 · Week 10

Final

Texans

Houston

QB David Carr

27·34

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Jon Kitna

Paul Brown Stadium · outdoors · grass · 43°F · wind 7mph

Closing spread

CIN -4

Total

40

Model margin

+4.3est.

CIN perspective

Push chance

2.6%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Bengals
  • Texans

How each play moved the game.

Bengals winsTexans wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Texansedge mapBengals
  • -0.099EPA / play+0.049
  • 38.7%Success rate43.9%
  • -0.096EPA / dropback+0.126
  • -0.102EPA / rush-0.053
  • 9.0%Explosive rate7.6%
  • 30.8%Third-down rate44.6%
  • 65.8%Red-zone TD rate62.0%
  • 1.15Points / drive1.83
  • 2.8%Turnover rate1.9%
  • +0.041EPA / play allowed+0.077

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

HOU lead 9–5 since 1999

Meetings average 39 points. CIN are 5-9 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W10HOU @ CIN3027HOU
2020 · W16CIN @ HOU3731CIN
2017 · W2HOU @ CIN139HOU
2016 · W16CIN @ HOU1012HOU
2015 · W10HOU @ CIN106HOU
2014 · W12CIN @ HOU2213CIN
2012 · playoffsCIN @ HOU1319HOU
2011 · playoffsCIN @ HOU1031HOU

Box score

Individual performances

Texans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
David Carr11/2514621

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Domanick Williams151046.91
David Carr22110.50
Andre Johnson11111.00
Tony Hollings144.00

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jon Kitna18/2618211

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Rudi Johnson431824.22
Jon Kitna5234.60
Peter Warrick22311.50
Brandon Bennett263.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +43.6%6.6%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Texans.

Half-point at risk

2.55%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

60.6%

Expected total

44.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.76
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.32