Closing spread
HOU -3
Total
41.5
Model margin
+2.8est.
HOU perspective
Push chance
7.5%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Bengals
- OutClint BolingGShoulder· DNP
- OutTyler EifertTEBack· DNP
- OutTyler KroftTEKnee· DNP
- OutVontaze BurfictLBKnee· DNP
- QuestionableA.J. GreenWRHamstring· Full
- QuestionableJeremy HillRBKnee· Full
- QuestionableMichael JohnsonDEShoulder· Full
- DNPAlex EricksonWRNot Injury Related
Texans
- QuestionableJohnathan JosephCBRibs· Limited
- QuestionableLamar MillerRBAnkle· DNP
- LimitedBrian CushingLBAnkle
- LimitedJadeveon ClowneyDEElbow
- LimitedNick NovakKOblique
Win probability
- Texans
- Bengals
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.052EPA / play-0.079
- 45.3%Success rate41.9%
- +0.116EPA / dropback-0.029
- -0.050EPA / rush-0.154
- 7.8%Explosive rate6.9%
- +2.98CPOE-3.29
- 38.9%Third-down rate36.9%
- 58.5%Red-zone TD rate42.0%
- 1.86Points / drive1.45
- 1.4%Turnover rate1.9%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
HOU lead 9–6 since 1999
Meetings average 38.1 points. HOU are 9-6 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | CIN–HOU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | Q1 15:00 | 3 | -1 | Punt | 0–0 |
| HOU | Q1 13:15 | 6 | 13 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CIN | Q1 10:01 | 5 | 20 | Punt | 0–0 |
| HOU | Q1 7:16 | 3 | -7 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CIN | Q1 5:19 | 6 | 13 | Punt | 0–0 |
| HOU | Q1 2:33 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CIN | Q1 1:05 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 0–0 |
| HOU | Q2 14:13 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CIN | Q2 12:40 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 0–0 |
| HOU | Q2 11:39 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CIN | Q2 10:04 | 4 | 8 | Punt | 0–0 |
| HOU | Q2 7:29 | 5 | 10 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CIN | Q2 4:58 | 13 | 67 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| HOU | Q3 15:00 | 13 | 63 | Field goal | 3–3 |
| CIN | Q3 9:05 | 6 | 9 | Punt | 3–3 |
| HOU | Q3 5:05 | 15 | 49 | Field goal | 3–6 |
| CIN | Q4 13:31 | 2 | 15 | Turnover | 3–6 |
| HOU | Q4 12:41 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 3–6 |
| CIN | Q4 11:40 | 3 | 91 | Touchdown | 10–6 |
| HOU | Q4 10:45 | 4 | 75 | Touchdown | 10–12 |
| CIN | Q4 8:41 | 3 | -3 | Punt | 10–12 |
| HOU | Q4 7:00 | 6 | 29 | Punt | 10–12 |
| CIN | Q4 3:46 | 12 | 60 | Missed field goal | 10–12 |
Box score
Individual performances
Bengals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Dalton | 28/41 | 268 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rex Burkhead | 12 | 42 | 3.5 | 0 |
| Jeremy Hill | 7 | 8 | 1.1 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon LaFell | 6 | 10 | 130 | 1 |
| Cody Core | 8 | 14 | 39 | 0 |
| C.J. Uzomah | 5 | 6 | 28 | 0 |
| Rex Burkhead | 4 | 4 | 25 | 0 |
| Tyler Boyd | 2 | 4 | 25 | 0 |
| Ryan Hewitt | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
| James Wright | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
| Alex Erickson | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
Texans
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Savage | 18/29 | 176 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfred Blue | 21 | 73 | 3.5 | 1 |
| Tom Savage | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 |
| Akeem Hunt | 1 | 6 | 6.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeAndre Hopkins | 3 | 6 | 43 | 0 |
| C.J. Fiedorowicz | 4 | 7 | 42 | 0 |
| Will Fuller | 3 | 6 | 39 | 0 |
| Akeem Hunt | 2 | 2 | 28 | 0 |
| Alfred Blue | 4 | 4 | 17 | 0 |
| Keith Mumphery | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
| Ryan Griffin | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Texans; negative favour Bengals.
Half-point at risk
7.52%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
56.4%
Expected total
43.1est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.24
- Home-field advantage+1.74
- Quarterback adjustment+2.25
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+2.75



