2003 · WC

Final

Titans

Tennessee

QB Steve McNair

20·17

Ravens

Baltimore

QB Anthony Wright

M&T Bank Stadium · outdoors · sportturf · 63°F · wind 9mph

Closing spread

TEN -1

Total

38

Model margin

+4.0est.

BAL perspective

Push chance

2.0%est.

Win probability

  • Ravens
  • Titans

How each play moved the game.

Ravens winsTitans wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Titansedge mapRavens
  • +0.040EPA / play-0.093
  • 42.3%Success rate38.5%
  • +0.215EPA / dropback-0.112
  • -0.172EPA / rush-0.074
  • 9.2%Explosive rate9.7%
  • 41.2%Third-down rate31.7%
  • 62.5%Red-zone TD rate53.9%
  • 1.93Points / drive1.53
  • 1.7%Turnover rate3.5%
  • -0.083EPA / play allowed-0.194

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

BAL lead 12–9 since 1999

BAL have won 2 straight. Meetings average 35 points. BAL are 12-8-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W6BAL @ TEN2416BAL
2020 · playoffsBAL @ TEN2013BAL
2020 · W11TEN @ BAL3024TEN
2019 · playoffsTEN @ BAL2812TEN
2018 · W6BAL @ TEN210BAL
2017 · W9BAL @ TEN2023TEN
2014 · W10TEN @ BAL721BAL
2011 · W2BAL @ TEN1326TEN

Box score

Individual performances

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Steve McNair14/2315913

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Eddie George25883.50
Chris Brown11615.51
Steve McNair4164.00

Ravens

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Anthony Wright20/3721412

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jamal Lewis14352.50
Anthony Wright2199.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -13.7%6.7%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour Ravens; negative favour Titans.

Half-point at risk

2.04%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

59.6%

Expected total

42.5est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.03
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+1.41
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.95