2004 · Week 4

Final

Commanders

Washington

QB Mark Brunell

13·17

Browns

Cleveland

QB Jeff Garcia

Cleveland Browns Stadium · outdoors · grass · 58°F · wind 12mph

Closing spread

WAS -2.5

Total

36

Model margin

+3.6est.

CLE perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Browns
  • Commanders

How each play moved the game.

Browns winsCommanders wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Commandersedge mapBrowns
  • -0.121EPA / play-0.147
  • 38.9%Success rate38.6%
  • -0.102EPA / dropback-0.067
  • -0.145EPA / rush-0.251
  • 6.6%Explosive rate7.6%
  • 31.9%Third-down rate29.2%
  • 56.8%Red-zone TD rate50.7%
  • 1.03Points / drive1.18
  • 2.5%Turnover rate3.8%
  • -0.104EPA / play allowed-0.002

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

WAS lead 4–3 since 1999

Meetings average 42.9 points. CLE are 4-3 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W5CLE @ WAS1334WAS
2022 · W17CLE @ WAS2410CLE
2020 · W3WAS @ CLE2034CLE
2016 · W4CLE @ WAS2031WAS
2012 · W15WAS @ CLE3821WAS
2008 · W7CLE @ WAS1114WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Mark Brunell17/3219200

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Clinton Portis20582.91
Mark Brunell393.00
Ladell Betts263.00

Browns

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jeff Garcia14/2119510

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Lee Suggs22823.71
William Green4174.30
Andre Davis1-3-3.00
Jeff Garcia3-5-1.70

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -2.53.8%6.7%7.5%3.2%4.8%3.1%

Positive margins favour Browns; negative favour Commanders.

Half-point at risk

1.98%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

58.8%

Expected total

42.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.69
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+3.70
  • Rest differential+0.08
  • Expected margin+3.65