2004 · Week 9

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Josh McCown

24·23

Dolphins

Miami

QB Jay Fiedler

Pro Player Stadium · outdoors · grass · 80°F · wind 12mph

Closing spread

MIA -3

Total

34.5

Model margin

+2.0est.

MIA perspective

Push chance

7.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Dolphins
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Dolphins winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapDolphins
  • -0.097EPA / play-0.173
  • 38.1%Success rate35.8%
  • -0.074EPA / dropback-0.181
  • -0.128EPA / rush-0.159
  • 7.0%Explosive rate6.9%
  • 34.7%Third-down rate34.6%
  • 58.0%Red-zone TD rate56.0%
  • 1.19Points / drive0.97
  • 2.5%Turnover rate3.7%
  • -0.081EPA / play allowed-0.054

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

ARI lead 4–3 since 1999

Meetings average 48.1 points. MIA are 3-4 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W8ARI @ MIA2827ARI
2020 · W9MIA @ ARI3431MIA
2016 · W14ARI @ MIA2326MIA
2012 · W4MIA @ ARI2124ARI
2008 · W2MIA @ ARI1031ARI
1999 · W2ARI @ MIA1619MIA

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Josh McCown18/3116210

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Troy Hambrick47017.50
Emmitt Smith19422.21
Josh McCown199.00
Obafemi Ayanbadejo273.50
Bryant Johnson1-7-7.00

Dolphins

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jay Fiedler12/2112910
A.J. Feeley6/1512901

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Travis Minor11908.20
Sammy Morris16563.51
Chris Chambers12424.00
Jay Fiedler263.00
Marty Booker1-8-8.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +34.1%2.7%7.1%7.5%3.1%4.7%3.0%

Positive margins favour Dolphins; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

7.50%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

54.4%

Expected total

41.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.69
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+1.21
  • Rest differential-0.08
  • Expected margin+2.00