NFC West · 2004
Arizona Cardinals
Efficiency
How this team plays
Percentile against the teams that played this season, computed from play-by-play.
Offence
Higher is better.
- EPA / play-0.097
- Success rate38.1%
- EPA / dropback-0.074
- EPA / rush-0.128
- Explosive rate7.0%
- Third-down rate34.7%
- Red-zone TD rate58.0%
- Points / drive1.19
- Turnover rate2.5%
← worse in leagueleague averagebetter →
Defence
Oriented so that further right is always better.
- EPA / play allowed-0.081
- Success rate allowed39.1%
- EPA / dropback allowed-0.026
- EPA / rush allowed-0.154
- Explosive rate allowed9.5%
- Pressure rate (proxy)6.3%
- Sack rate6.3%
- Points / drive allowed1.40
← worse in leagueleague averagebetter →
Offensive EPA / play — league shape-0.097 · 22th %ile
Defensive EPA / play allowed — league shape (left is better)-0.081 · 26th %ile
Form
The shape of the season
Rolling four-week EPA per play. The aggregate hides collapses and surges; this shows them.
4-week rolling EPA/play — up is good for both lines.
- Offense
- Defense (prevented)
Betting profile
Against the number
Settled against closing lines. Descriptive, not predictive.
Roster
Roster
No roster published for 2004
Roster files begin in 1999 and are published weekly from 2002.
Schedule
16 games
| Wk | Opponent | Result | Spread | EPA/play |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @ Rams | L 10-17 | +11 | -0.068 |
| 2 | vs Patriots | L 12-23 | +8 | -0.275 |
| 3 | @ Falcons | L 3-6 | +11 | -0.297 |
| 4 | vs Saints | W 34-10 | +3.5 | +0.118 |
| 5 | @ 49ers | L 28-31 | +1 | +0.127 |
| 7 | vs Seahawks | W 25-17 | +6.5 | -0.180 |
| 8 | @ Bills | L 14-38 | +4.5 | -0.181 |
| 9 | @ Dolphins | W 24-23 | +3 | +0.077 |
| 10 | vs Giants | W 17-14 | -1 | -0.064 |
| 11 | @ Panthers | L 10-35 | +3 | -0.177 |
| 12 | vs Jets | L 3-13 | +3 | -0.149 |
| 13 | @ Lions | L 12-26 | +6 | -0.289 |
| 14 | vs 49ers | L 28-31 | -7 | +0.088 |
| 15 | vs Rams | W 31-7 | +3 | +0.059 |
| 16 | @ Seahawks | L 21-24 | +7 | -0.009 |
| 17 | vs Buccaneers | W 12-7 | -4 | -0.302 |