2005 · Week 1

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Kyle Orton

7·9

Commanders

Washington

QB Patrick Ramsey

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 83°F · wind 0mph

Closing spread

WAS -6

Total

33

Model margin

+4.2est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

3.2%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapCommanders
  • -0.138EPA / play+0.014
  • 37.0%Success rate41.3%
  • -0.147EPA / dropback+0.100
  • -0.129EPA / rush-0.083
  • 8.0%Explosive rate8.5%
  • 28.3%Third-down rate43.1%
  • 49.7%Red-zone TD rate58.5%
  • 1.08Points / drive1.80
  • 2.6%Turnover rate2.3%
  • -0.167EPA / play allowed-0.058

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

WAS lead 10–5 since 1999

Meetings average 44.4 points. WAS are 10-5 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W6CHI @ WAS2524CHI
2024 · W8CHI @ WAS1518WAS
2023 · W5CHI @ WAS4020CHI
2022 · W6WAS @ CHI127WAS
2019 · W3CHI @ WAS3115CHI
2016 · W16WAS @ CHI4121WAS
2015 · W14WAS @ CHI2421WAS
2013 · W7CHI @ WAS4145WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kyle Orton15/2814101

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Thomas Jones15312.11
Cedric Benson3103.30

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Patrick Ramsey6/1110501
Mark Brunell8/147000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Clinton Portis211215.80
Ladell Betts12413.40
Antonio Brown133.00
Patrick Ramsey111.00
Mark Brunell5-2-0.40

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +63.7%6.6%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

3.17%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

60.3%

Expected total

41.8est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.39
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+0.25
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.20