Closing spread
PIT -5
Total
36
Model margin
-5.3est.
PIT perspective
Push chance
1.5%est.
Win probability
- Steelers
- Jaguars
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.026EPA / play+0.057
- 42.5%Success rate43.9%
- +0.113EPA / dropback+0.202
- -0.079EPA / rush-0.067
- 9.0%Explosive rate9.7%
- 41.0%Third-down rate35.7%
- 64.4%Red-zone TD rate63.9%
- 1.68Points / drive1.99
- 1.5%Turnover rate2.0%
- -0.066EPA / play allowed-0.084
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
JAX lead 11–9 since 1999
Meetings average 37.9 points. PIT are 6-13-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | JAX–PIT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | Q1 15:00 | 5 | 13 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| JAX | Q1 12:39 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 0–0 |
| PIT | Q1 11:10 | 4 | 21 | Punt | 0–0 |
| JAX | Q1 8:15 | 10 | 58 | Turnover on downs | 0–0 |
| PIT | Q1 2:29 | 4 | -7 | Turnover | 6–0 |
| JAX | Q1 1:19 | 1 | 7 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| PIT | Q1 1:12 | 6 | 21 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| JAX | Q2 14:52 | 3 | 3 | Opp touchdown | 7–14 |
| JAX | Q2 13:50 | 8 | 34 | Punt | 7–14 |
| PIT | Q2 8:16 | 4 | 11 | Punt | 7–14 |
| JAX | Q2 7:17 | 3 | -8 | Punt | 7–14 |
| PIT | Q2 5:37 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 7–14 |
| JAX | Q2 4:38 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 7–14 |
| PIT | Q2 3:17 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 7–14 |
| JAX | Q2 1:43 | 5 | 15 | Field goal | 10–14 |
| JAX | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 56 | Touchdown | 17–14 |
| PIT | Q3 11:46 | 6 | 20 | Punt | 17–14 |
| JAX | Q3 8:40 | 4 | 21 | Punt | 17–14 |
| PIT | Q3 6:28 | 6 | 22 | Punt | 17–14 |
| JAX | Q3 4:23 | 9 | 33 | Punt | 17–14 |
| PIT | Q4 14:52 | 12 | 59 | Field goal | 17–17 |
| JAX | Q4 9:38 | 5 | 13 | Punt | 17–17 |
| PIT | Q4 7:09 | 8 | 54 | Missed field goal | 17–17 |
| JAX | Q4 3:28 | 11 | 17 | Turnover | 17–17 |
| PIT | Q4 0:19 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 17–17 |
| PIT | OT | 3 | -1 | Turnover | 17–17 |
| JAX | OT | 3 | -7 | Punt | 17–17 |
| PIT | OT | 2 | 0 | Opp touchdown | 23–17 |
Box score
Individual performances
Jaguars
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Byron Leftwich | 19/35 | 177 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvin Pearman | 15 | 22 | 1.5 | 0 |
| Byron Leftwich | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 |
| Matt Jones | 1 | -7 | -7.0 | 0 |
Steelers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tommy Maddox | 11/28 | 154 | 1 | 3 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Willie Parker | 21 | 55 | 2.6 | 0 |
| Tommy Maddox | 3 | 15 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Jerome Bettis | 4 | 4 | 1.0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Steelers; negative favour Jaguars.
Half-point at risk
1.52%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
35.2%
Expected total
44.7est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.01
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment-7.73
- Rest differential-0.08
- Expected margin-5.26



