2005 · Week 9 · Division

Final

Eagles

Philadelphia

QB Donovan McNabb

10·17

Commanders

Washington

QB Mark Brunell

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 68°F · wind 15mph

Closing spread

PK

Total

41

Model margin

+6.2est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

1.7%est.

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Eagles

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsEagles wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Eaglesedge mapCommanders
  • -0.104EPA / play+0.014
  • 39.5%Success rate41.3%
  • -0.063EPA / dropback+0.100
  • -0.192EPA / rush-0.083
  • 7.8%Explosive rate8.5%
  • 34.3%Third-down rate43.1%
  • 58.8%Red-zone TD rate58.5%
  • 1.28Points / drive1.80
  • 3.0%Turnover rate2.3%
  • -0.028EPA / play allowed-0.058

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

PHI lead 35–21 since 1999

Meetings average 45.6 points. WAS are 26-27-3 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2026 · W1WAS @ PHI2224PHI
2025 · W18WAS @ PHI2417WAS
2025 · W16PHI @ WAS2918PHI
2024 · playoffsWAS @ PHI2355PHI
2024 · W16PHI @ WAS3336WAS
2024 · W11WAS @ PHI1826PHI
2023 · W8PHI @ WAS3831PHI
2023 · W4WAS @ PHI3134PHI

Box score

Individual performances

Eagles

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Donovan McNabb22/3530411

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Brian Westbrook17241.40
Donovan McNabb3124.00
Lamar Gordon393.00

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Mark Brunell21/2922400

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Clinton Portis21673.21
Mark Brunell441.00
Ladell Betts242.00
Santana Moss122.00
Mike Sellers111.01

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line 03.2%6.1%7.3%3.2%5.0%3.3%3.2%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Eagles.

Half-point at risk

1.70%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

65.4%

Expected total

42.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+3.62
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+6.18