Closing spread
CHI -3
Total
30.5
Model margin
+3.5est.
CHI perspective
Push chance
7.5%est.
the line sits on a key number
Win probability
- Bears
- Falcons
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.020EPA / play-0.138
- 40.6%Success rate37.0%
- -0.017EPA / dropback-0.147
- -0.024EPA / rush-0.129
- 9.3%Explosive rate8.0%
- 43.8%Third-down rate28.3%
- 51.9%Red-zone TD rate49.7%
- 1.65Points / drive1.08
- 2.4%Turnover rate2.6%
- -0.022EPA / play allowed-0.167
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
CHI lead 8–4 since 1999
CHI have won 2 straight. Meetings average 41.2 points. CHI are 9-2-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | ATL–CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHI | Q1 15:00 | 3 | -3 | Punt | 0–0 |
| ATL | Q1 13:30 | 6 | 14 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 10:44 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 0–0 |
| ATL | Q1 9:49 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 8:05 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 0–0 |
| ATL | Q1 6:36 | 7 | 12 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 3:33 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 0–0 |
| ATL | Q1 1:56 | 11 | 56 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| CHI | Q2 10:16 | 6 | 52 | Field goal | 3–3 |
| ATL | Q2 6:33 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 3–3 |
| CHI | Q2 5:23 | 4 | 8 | Field goal | 3–6 |
| ATL | Q2 3:20 | 4 | 26 | Punt | 3–6 |
| CHI | Q2 1:40 | 5 | 39 | Punt | 3–6 |
| ATL | Q2 0:17 | 1 | 0 | End of half | 3–6 |
| ATL | Q3 15:00 | 3 | -6 | Punt | 3–6 |
| CHI | Q3 12:55 | 10 | 49 | Turnover | 3–12 |
| CHI | Q3 8:20 | 1 | 1 | Touchdown | 3–13 |
| ATL | Q3 8:17 | 5 | 15 | Turnover | 3–13 |
| CHI | Q3 6:07 | 10 | 50 | Field goal | 3–16 |
| ATL | Q3 0:53 | 8 | 46 | Turnover | 3–16 |
| CHI | Q4 12:09 | 5 | 7 | Punt | 3–16 |
| ATL | Q4 9:21 | 4 | 6 | Turnover on downs | 3–16 |
| CHI | Q4 6:55 | 5 | 10 | Missed field goal | 3–16 |
| ATL | Q4 4:11 | 4 | 9 | Turnover on downs | 3–16 |
| CHI | Q4 2:34 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 3–16 |
| ATL | Q4 1:36 | 7 | 47 | End of half | 3–16 |
Box score
Individual performances
Falcons
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Vick | 13/32 | 122 | 0 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warrick Dunn | 17 | 81 | 4.8 | 0 |
| Mike Vick | 6 | 35 | 5.8 | 0 |
| T.J. Duckett | 8 | -2 | -0.3 | 0 |
Bears
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rex Grossman | 9/16 | 93 | 0 | 1 |
| Kyle Orton | 2/10 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Jones | 27 | 91 | 3.4 | 1 |
| Bernard Berrian | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 0 |
| Adrian Peterson | 3 | 6 | 2.0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Falcons.
Half-point at risk
7.52%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
58.4%
Expected total
41.6est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.86
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential+0.08
- Expected margin+3.50



