Closing spread
ATL -4
Total
46
Model margin
+4.3est.
ATL perspective
Push chance
2.6%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Bears
- DoubtfulAdrian PetersonRBKnee· DNP
- DoubtfulHunter HillenmeyerLBRib· DNP
- QuestionableAnthony AdamsDTToe· Limited
- QuestionableIsrael IdonijeDTKnee· Full
- QuestionablePisa TinoisamoaLBKnee· Full
- ProbableTommie HarrisDTKnee· Full
Falcons
- OutAntoine HarrisSKnee· DNP
- QuestionableBrian WilliamsCBEye· DNP
- QuestionableOvie MughelliRBCalf· DNP
- ProbableJason ElamKleft Hamstring· Full
- ProbableMarty BookerWRAbdomen· Full
Win probability
- Falcons
- Bears
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.089EPA / play+0.041
- 39.6%Success rate43.4%
- -0.064EPA / dropback+0.093
- -0.135EPA / rush-0.036
- 8.4%Explosive rate8.0%
- +0.30CPOE-1.75
- 37.3%Third-down rate42.8%
- 52.0%Red-zone TD rate59.8%
- 1.57Points / drive1.97
- 3.2%Turnover rate2.1%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
CHI lead 8–4 since 1999
CHI have won 2 straight. Meetings average 41.2 points. ATL are 2-9-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | CHI–ATL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATL | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 13:48 | 13 | 50 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| ATL | Q1 7:01 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 5:02 | 4 | 14 | Punt | 0–0 |
| ATL | Q1 2:17 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 0:34 | 2 | 44 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| ATL | Q2 14:54 | 6 | 9 | Punt | 7–0 |
| CHI | Q2 12:09 | 4 | 12 | Turnover | 7–0 |
| ATL | Q2 10:17 | 3 | 55 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| CHI | Q2 9:03 | 6 | 17 | Punt | 7–7 |
| ATL | Q2 5:06 | 14 | 74 | Touchdown | 7–14 |
| CHI | Q2 0:04 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 7–14 |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 6 | 17 | Punt | 7–14 |
| ATL | Q3 11:27 | 3 | 3 | Turnover | 7–14 |
| CHI | Q3 10:19 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 7–14 |
| ATL | Q3 8:17 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 7–14 |
| CHI | Q3 7:14 | 13 | 58 | Turnover | 7–14 |
| ATL | Q3 1:11 | 13 | 62 | Turnover | 7–14 |
| CHI | Q4 9:48 | 10 | 79 | Touchdown | 14–14 |
| ATL | Q4 6:14 | 7 | 41 | Touchdown | 14–21 |
| CHI | Q4 3:06 | 12 | 76 | Turnover on downs | 14–21 |
| ATL | Q4 0:29 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 14–21 |
Box score
Individual performances
Bears
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jay Cutler | 27/43 | 300 | 2 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jay Cutler | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 0 |
| Matt Forte | 15 | 23 | 1.5 | 0 |
| Garrett Wolfe | 3 | 15 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Devin Hester | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devin Hester | 6 | 10 | 83 | 0 |
| Greg Olsen | 5 | 10 | 57 | 1 |
| Earl Bennett | 4 | 5 | 57 | 0 |
| Matt Forte | 5 | 5 | 37 | 0 |
| Johnny Knox | 3 | 7 | 34 | 1 |
| Desmond Clark | 3 | 4 | 32 | 0 |
| Jason McKie | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Falcons
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Ryan | 19/33 | 185 | 2 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Turner | 13 | 30 | 2.3 | 1 |
| Jerious Norwood | 4 | 21 | 5.3 | 0 |
| Matt Ryan | 3 | 8 | 2.7 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roddy White | 4 | 6 | 56 | 1 |
| Tony Gonzalez | 4 | 9 | 52 | 1 |
| Michael Turner | 2 | 2 | 16 | 0 |
| Michael Jenkins | 2 | 6 | 15 | 0 |
| Jerious Norwood | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 |
| Justin Peelle | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 |
| Brian Finneran | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Falcons; negative favour Bears.
Half-point at risk
2.55%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
60.6%
Expected total
43.9est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.41
- Home-field advantage+2.49
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential-0.56
- Expected margin+4.34



