Closing spread
ATL -3
Total
48.5
Model margin
+4.9est.
ATL perspective
Push chance
7.5%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Bears
- OutDane CruikshankSHamstring· Limited
- OutN'Keal HarryWRIllness· DNP
- QuestionableAl-Quadin MuhammadDEKnee· Full
- QuestionableKindle VildorCBAnkle· Full
- QuestionableTeven JenkinsTHip· Full
Falcons
- OutFeleipe FranksTECalf· DNP
- QuestionableA.J. TerrellCBHamstring· Limited
- QuestionableErik HarrisSFoot· Limited
- DNPColby GossettGNot injury related - personal matter
Win probability
- Falcons
- Bears
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.039EPA / play+0.002
- 41.1%Success rate45.4%
- -0.070EPA / dropback-0.001
- -0.004EPA / rush+0.004
- 10.4%Explosive rate9.6%
- -4.05CPOE-0.74
- 41.0%Third-down rate41.9%
- 60.7%Red-zone TD rate60.2%
- 1.78Points / drive1.97
- 2.3%Turnover rate1.8%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
CHI lead 8–4 since 1999
CHI have won 2 straight. Meetings average 41.2 points. ATL are 2-9-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | CHI–ATL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATL | Q1 15:00 | 10 | 69 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| CHI | Q1 9:37 | 7 | 44 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| ATL | Q1 6:02 | 6 | 18 | Punt | 7–7 |
| CHI | Q1 2:59 | 5 | 17 | Punt | 7–7 |
| CHI | Q1 0:02 | 5 | 5 | Punt | 7–7 |
| ATL | Q2 12:45 | 4 | 5 | Punt | 7–7 |
| CHI | Q2 11:37 | 6 | 47 | Field goal | 10–7 |
| ATL | Q2 7:42 | 1 | 17 | Turnover | 10–7 |
| CHI | Q2 7:24 | 7 | 29 | Touchdown | 17–13 |
| ATL | Q2 4:31 | 0 | 0 | Touchdown | 17–14 |
| CHI | Q2 4:18 | 10 | 47 | Missed field goal | 17–14 |
| ATL | Q2 1:10 | 5 | 42 | Field goal | 17–17 |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 17–17 |
| ATL | Q3 13:15 | 4 | 16 | Punt | 17–17 |
| CHI | Q3 10:43 | 8 | 12 | Punt | 17–17 |
| ATL | Q3 5:15 | 7 | 46 | Touchdown | 17–24 |
| CHI | Q3 1:48 | 15 | 82 | Touchdown | 24–24 |
| ATL | Q4 8:16 | 11 | 40 | Field goal | 24–27 |
| CHI | Q4 1:47 | 3 | 5 | Turnover | 24–27 |
| ATL | Q4 1:07 | 2 | 30 | End of half | 24–27 |
Box score
Individual performances
Bears
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Fields | 14/21 | 153 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Fields | 18 | 85 | 4.7 | 1 |
| David Montgomery | 17 | 67 | 3.9 | 1 |
| Trestan Ebner | 6 | 8 | 1.3 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Montgomery | 3 | 4 | 54 | 0 |
| Cole Kmet | 3 | 4 | 35 | 0 |
| Darnell Mooney | 4 | 5 | 29 | 1 |
| Equanimeous St. Brown | 2 | 2 | 24 | 0 |
| Chase Claypool | 2 | 3 | 11 | 0 |
| Trestan Ebner | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Falcons
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marcus Mariota | 13/20 | 131 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyler Allgeier | 8 | 55 | 6.9 | 0 |
| Cordarrelle Patterson | 10 | 52 | 5.2 | 0 |
| Marcus Mariota | 13 | 25 | 1.9 | 1 |
| Olamide Zaccheaus | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 |
| Caleb Huntley | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kyle Pitts | 3 | 5 | 43 | 0 |
| Damiere Byrd | 2 | 2 | 29 | 0 |
| MyCole Pruitt | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 |
| KhaDarel Hodge | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 |
| Olamide Zaccheaus | 1 | 2 | 9 | 0 |
| Tyler Allgeier | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
| Cordarrelle Patterson | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
| Caleb Huntley | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Drake London | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Falcons; negative favour Bears.
Half-point at risk
7.46%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
62.1%
Expected total
45.1est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.97
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential+0.24
- Expected margin+4.91



