2005 · Week 16

Final

Bills

Buffalo

QB Kelly Holcomb

37·27

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Carson Palmer

Paul Brown Stadium · outdoors · fieldturf · 51°F · wind 10mph

Closing spread

CIN -13

Total

44

Model margin

+1.1est.

CIN perspective

Push chance

1.5%est.

Win probability

  • Bengals
  • Bills

How each play moved the game.

Bengals winsBills wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Billsedge mapBengals
  • -0.082EPA / play+0.102
  • 39.5%Success rate48.2%
  • -0.036EPA / dropback+0.159
  • -0.141EPA / rush+0.023
  • 7.0%Explosive rate9.1%
  • 37.9%Third-down rate43.8%
  • 43.1%Red-zone TD rate60.3%
  • 1.44Points / drive2.30
  • 2.6%Turnover rate1.9%
  • +0.069EPA / play allowed+0.010

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

BUF lead 9–6 since 1999

Meetings average 48.3 points. CIN are 8-7 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W14CIN @ BUF3439BUF
2023 · W9BUF @ CIN1824CIN
2022 · playoffsCIN @ BUF2710CIN
2019 · W3CIN @ BUF1721BUF
2017 · W5BUF @ CIN1620CIN
2016 · W11BUF @ CIN1612BUF
2015 · W6CIN @ BUF3421CIN
2013 · W6CIN @ BUF2724CIN

Box score

Individual performances

Bills

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kelly Holcomb24/3130811

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Willis McGahee23662.90
Kelly Holcomb210.51

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Carson Palmer25/3626622
Jon Kitna2/21700

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Rudi Johnson18884.90
Carson Palmer4143.50
Tab Perry122.01

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +137.4%3.0%4.6%2.8%

Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Bills.

Half-point at risk

1.48%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

51.9%

Expected total

46.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.93
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment-3.35
  • Rest differential-0.08
  • Expected margin+1.06