Closing spread
CIN -2.5
Total
48
Model margin
+2.1est.
CIN perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Bills
- OutCorbin BryantDTShoulder· DNP
- QuestionableJerry HughesLBHand· Limited
- QuestionableJustin HunterWRGroin· Limited
- QuestionableMarcell DareusDTGroin· Limited
- QuestionableRobert WoodsWRFoot· Limited
- QuestionableWalter PowellWRHip· Limited
- DNPCardale JonesQBIllness
Bengals
- DoubtfulC.J. UzomahTECalf· DNP
- QuestionableWallace GilberryDECalf· Full
Win probability
- Bengals
- Bills
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.056EPA / play+0.052
- 44.9%Success rate45.3%
- +0.076EPA / dropback+0.116
- +0.028EPA / rush-0.050
- 10.0%Explosive rate7.8%
- +0.94CPOE+2.98
- 41.7%Third-down rate38.9%
- 68.0%Red-zone TD rate58.5%
- 2.08Points / drive1.86
- 1.1%Turnover rate1.4%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
BUF lead 9–6 since 1999
Meetings average 48.3 points. CIN are 8-7 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | BUF–CIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 0–0 |
| BUF | Q1 13:15 | 9 | 80 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| CIN | Q1 8:52 | 14 | 50 | Touchdown | 7–6 |
| BUF | Q1 2:34 | 4 | 13 | Punt | 7–6 |
| CIN | Q2 14:54 | 9 | 30 | Turnover | 7–6 |
| BUF | Q2 11:08 | 4 | 5 | Field goal | 10–6 |
| CIN | Q2 9:03 | 13 | 61 | Touchdown | 10–12 |
| BUF | Q2 3:10 | 9 | 48 | Turnover | 10–12 |
| CIN | Q2 0:47 | 5 | 43 | Turnover | 10–12 |
| BUF | Q2 0:03 | 1 | 3 | End of half | 10–12 |
| BUF | Q3 15:00 | 7 | 32 | Field goal | 13–12 |
| CIN | Q3 10:25 | 5 | 23 | Punt | 13–12 |
| BUF | Q3 8:06 | 4 | 14 | Punt | 13–12 |
| CIN | Q3 6:27 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 13–12 |
| BUF | Q3 5:17 | 14 | 93 | Field goal | 16–12 |
| CIN | Q4 12:05 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 16–12 |
| BUF | Q4 11:00 | 5 | 28 | Punt | 16–12 |
| CIN | Q4 8:19 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 16–12 |
| BUF | Q4 7:19 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 16–12 |
| CIN | Q4 5:33 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 16–12 |
| BUF | Q4 4:14 | 5 | 23 | Punt | 16–12 |
| CIN | Q4 2:30 | 11 | 73 | End of half | 16–12 |
Box score
Individual performances
Bills
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyrod Taylor | 19/27 | 166 | 0 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Gillislee | 14 | 72 | 5.1 | 0 |
| Tyrod Taylor | 9 | 39 | 4.3 | 0 |
| LeSean McCoy | 5 | 33 | 6.6 | 1 |
| Jonathan Williams | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 0 |
| Percy Harvin | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon Tate | 2 | 3 | 48 | 0 |
| Robert Woods | 3 | 3 | 41 | 0 |
| Charles Clay | 5 | 7 | 23 | 0 |
| Reggie Bush | 2 | 2 | 21 | 0 |
| Marquise Goodwin | 2 | 3 | 15 | 0 |
| LeSean McCoy | 2 | 3 | 12 | 0 |
| Percy Harvin | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0 |
| Mike Gillislee | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Jonathan Williams | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bengals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Dalton | 24/43 | 207 | 1 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Hill | 16 | 62 | 3.9 | 0 |
| Giovani Bernard | 7 | 21 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Andy Dalton | 4 | 10 | 2.5 | 1 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyler Boyd | 6 | 8 | 54 | 1 |
| Giovani Bernard | 5 | 8 | 40 | 0 |
| Tyler Eifert | 3 | 6 | 37 | 0 |
| Brandon LaFell | 4 | 9 | 32 | 0 |
| James Wright | 2 | 3 | 22 | 0 |
| Rex Burkhead | 1 | 1 | 14 | 0 |
| Alex Erickson | 1 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
| Jeremy Hill | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| A.J. Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Bills.
Half-point at risk
7.50%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
54.7%
Expected total
44.5est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.90
- Home-field advantage+1.74
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential-0.56
- Expected margin+2.08



