2005 · WC

Final

Commanders

Washington

QB Mark Brunell

17·10

Buccaneers

Tampa Bay

QB Chris Simms

Raymond James Stadium · outdoors · grass · 52°F · wind 12mph

Closing spread

TB -2.5

Total

37.5

Model margin

+1.4est.

TB perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Buccaneers
  • Commanders

How each play moved the game.

Buccaneers winsCommanders wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Commandersedge mapBuccaneers
  • +0.014EPA / play-0.066
  • 41.3%Success rate39.7%
  • +0.100EPA / dropback-0.064
  • -0.083EPA / rush-0.068
  • 8.5%Explosive rate6.8%
  • 43.1%Third-down rate38.9%
  • 58.5%Red-zone TD rate57.3%
  • 1.80Points / drive1.36
  • 2.3%Turnover rate2.2%
  • -0.058EPA / play allowed-0.097

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

All square 9–9 since 1999

Meetings average 40.5 points. TB are 7-9-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · playoffsWAS @ TB2320WAS
2024 · W1WAS @ TB2037TB
2021 · W10TB @ WAS1929WAS
2020 · playoffsTB @ WAS3123TB
2018 · W10WAS @ TB163WAS
2015 · W7TB @ WAS3031WAS
2014 · W11TB @ WAS277TB
2012 · W4WAS @ TB2422WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Mark Brunell7/154101
Clinton Portis0/1000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Clinton Portis16533.31
Ladell Betts10252.50
Santana Moss11111.00
Mark Brunell461.50

Buccaneers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Chris Simms25/3819802

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Cadillac Williams18492.70
Chris Simms3113.71

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +2.54.2%2.8%7.2%7.5%3.0%4.6%2.9%

Positive margins favour Buccaneers; negative favour Commanders.

Half-point at risk

7.47%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

53.0%

Expected total

42.8est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.12
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.45