2006 · Week 3 · Division

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Rex Grossman

19·16

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Brad Johnson

Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

CHI -3.5

Total

35

Model margin

+0.9est.

MIN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Vikings
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Vikings winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapVikings
  • -0.046EPA / play-0.151
  • 40.3%Success rate39.3%
  • -0.039EPA / dropback-0.174
  • -0.054EPA / rush-0.117
  • 9.4%Explosive rate8.0%
  • -3.50CPOE+1.13
  • 37.7%Third-down rate33.2%
  • 50.6%Red-zone TD rate45.1%
  • 1.80Points / drive0.99
  • 3.0%Turnover rate2.9%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 28–26 since 1999

Meetings average 41.8 points. MIN are 23-30-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11CHI @ MIN1917CHI
2025 · W1MIN @ CHI2724MIN
2024 · W15CHI @ MIN1230MIN
2024 · W12MIN @ CHI3027MIN
2023 · W12CHI @ MIN1210CHI
2023 · W6MIN @ CHI1913MIN
2022 · W18MIN @ CHI2913MIN
2022 · W5CHI @ MIN2229MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Rex Grossman23/4127812

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Thomas Jones18543.00
Rex Grossman3-3-1.00

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brad Johnson21/3119400

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chester Taylor20743.70
Mewelde Moore3237.70
Brad Johnson100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -3.54.3%2.8%7.2%7.4%3.0%4.5%2.8%

Positive margins favour Vikings; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

7.25%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

51.4%

Expected total

40.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.70
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+0.86