Closing spread
CHI -3.5
Total
37
Model margin
+3.2est.
CHI perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Win probability
- Bears
- Seahawks
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.075EPA / play-0.046
- 40.2%Success rate40.3%
- -0.031EPA / dropback-0.039
- -0.130EPA / rush-0.054
- 8.2%Explosive rate9.4%
- -1.93CPOE-3.50
- 37.5%Third-down rate37.7%
- 55.0%Red-zone TD rate50.6%
- 1.49Points / drive1.80
- 3.2%Turnover rate3.0%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
SEA lead 8–6 since 1999
Meetings average 41.3 points. CHI are 8-6 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | SEA–CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEA | Q1 15:00 | 5 | 17 | Punt | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 12:28 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 0–0 |
| SEA | Q1 11:07 | 6 | 57 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| CHI | Q1 8:58 | 12 | 64 | Touchdown | 3–7 |
| SEA | Q1 2:27 | 3 | -4 | Punt | 3–7 |
| CHI | Q1 1:06 | 7 | 55 | Field goal | 3–10 |
| SEA | Q2 13:33 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 3–10 |
| CHI | Q2 12:30 | 3 | -1 | Punt | 3–10 |
| SEA | Q2 11:36 | 4 | 39 | Turnover | 3–10 |
| CHI | Q2 9:56 | 8 | 34 | Field goal | 3–13 |
| SEA | Q2 6:23 | 4 | 5 | Turnover | 3–13 |
| CHI | Q2 4:52 | 5 | 37 | Touchdown | 3–20 |
| SEA | Q2 2:25 | 11 | 60 | Field goal | 6–20 |
| CHI | Q2 0:27 | 1 | 5 | End of half | 6–20 |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 12 | 61 | Touchdown | 6–27 |
| SEA | Q3 10:05 | 6 | 14 | Punt | 6–27 |
| CHI | Q3 7:37 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 6–27 |
| SEA | Q3 6:39 | 5 | 17 | Punt | 6–27 |
| CHI | Q3 4:34 | 7 | 68 | Touchdown | 6–34 |
| SEA | Q3 0:51 | 6 | 15 | Punt | 6–34 |
| CHI | Q4 13:17 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 6–34 |
| SEA | Q4 11:37 | 3 | -9 | Punt | 6–34 |
| CHI | Q4 9:52 | 3 | 8 | Field goal | 6–37 |
| SEA | Q4 7:43 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 6–37 |
| CHI | Q4 6:12 | 6 | 17 | Punt | 6–37 |
| SEA | Q4 1:51 | 3 | 8 | End of half | 6–37 |
Box score
Individual performances
Seahawks
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matt Hasselbeck | 16/35 | 196 | 0 | 2 |
| Seneca Wallace | 1/2 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maurice Morris | 11 | 35 | 3.2 | 0 |
| Matt Hasselbeck | 1 | 19 | 19.0 | 0 |
| Marquis Weeks | 3 | 8 | 2.7 | 0 |
Bears
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rex Grossman | 17/31 | 232 | 2 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Jones | 24 | 98 | 4.1 | 2 |
| Cedric Benson | 11 | 37 | 3.4 | 0 |
| Bernard Berrian | 1 | 5 | 5.0 | 0 |
| Rex Grossman | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
| Jason McKie | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Seahawks.
Half-point at risk
2.55%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
57.7%
Expected total
41.9est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.65
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+3.21



