2006 · Week 13 · Division

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Brad Johnson

13·23

Bears

Chicago

QB Rex Grossman

Soldier Field · outdoors · grass · 20°F · wind 15mph

Closing spread

CHI -9

Total

34

Model margin

+4.3est.

CHI perspective

Push chance

1.3%est.

Win probability

  • Bears
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Bears winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapBears
  • -0.151EPA / play-0.046
  • 39.3%Success rate40.3%
  • -0.174EPA / dropback-0.039
  • -0.117EPA / rush-0.054
  • 8.0%Explosive rate9.4%
  • +1.13CPOE-3.50
  • 33.2%Third-down rate37.7%
  • 45.1%Red-zone TD rate50.6%
  • 0.99Points / drive1.80
  • 2.9%Turnover rate3.0%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 28–26 since 1999

Meetings average 41.8 points. CHI are 30-23-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11CHI @ MIN1917CHI
2025 · W1MIN @ CHI2724MIN
2024 · W15CHI @ MIN1230MIN
2024 · W12MIN @ CHI3027MIN
2023 · W12CHI @ MIN1210CHI
2023 · W6MIN @ CHI1913MIN
2022 · W18MIN @ CHI2913MIN
2022 · W5CHI @ MIN2229MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brad Johnson11/267304
Brooks Bollinger7/97000
Tarvaris Jackson3/43500

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chester Taylor17995.80
Ciatrick Fason11756.81
Mewelde Moore3134.30
Brad Johnson331.00
Tarvaris Jackson122.00

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Rex Grossman6/193403

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Cedric Benson9606.71
Thomas Jones12322.70
Rex Grossman4-9-2.30

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +96.6%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

1.27%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

60.4%

Expected total

40.2est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.70
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+4.26