2006 · Week 14

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Rex Grossman

42·27

Rams

St. Louis

QB Marc Bulger

Edward Jones Dome · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

CHI -6

Total

41.5

Model margin

+1.6est.

STL perspective

Push chance

2.8%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Rams
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Rams winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

STL lead 8–7 since 1999

Meetings average 40 points. STL are 6-9 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · playoffsLA @ CHI20–17RAMS
2024 · W4LA @ CHI18–24CHI
2021 · W1CHI @ LA14–34RAMS
2020 · W7CHI @ LA10–24RAMS
2019 · W11CHI @ LA7–17RAMS
2018 · W14LA @ CHI6–15CHI
2015 · W10CHI @ STL37–13CHI
2013 · W12CHI @ STL21–42RAMS

Possession by possession

How it unfolded

Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.

Drive-by-drive log
BallStartPlaysYardsResultCHI–STL
CHIQ1 15:00618Punt0–0
LAQ1 11:2633Punt0–0
CHIQ1 10:02746Missed field goal0–0
LAQ1 6:4935Punt0–0
CHIQ1 5:46423Punt0–0
LAQ1 4:071299Touchdown6–6
CHIQ2 12:4500Touchdown7–6
LAQ2 12:32967Touchdown7–13
CHIQ2 7:43969Touchdown14–13
LAQ2 3:3041Punt14–13
CHIQ2 1:4839Punt14–13
LAQ2 1:25651Missed field goal14–13
LAQ3 15:00419Punt14–13
CHIQ3 11:56694Touchdown21–13
LAQ3 8:4039Punt21–13
CHIQ3 7:15869Touchdown28–13
LAQ3 3:3133Punt28–13
CHIQ3 2:341034Touchdown35–13
LAQ4 13:041574Touchdown41–20
CHIQ4 7:3500Touchdown42–20
LAQ4 7:221053Touchdown42–27
CHIQ4 4:41412Missed field goal42–27
LAQ4 4:051149Turnover42–27
CHIQ4 1:0500End of half42–27

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Rex Grossman13/2320020

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Thomas Jones11766.91
Cedric Benson16644.00
Rex Grossman3206.70
Adrian Peterson3124.01
Bernard Berrian100.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -64.2%2.8%7.1%7.5%3.0%4.6%

Positive margins favour Rams; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

2.77%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

53.3%

Expected total

42.4est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.98
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+1.58

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.