2007 · Week 10 · Division

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Brooks Bollinger

0·34

Packers

Green Bay

QB Brett Favre

Lambeau Field · outdoors · grass · 49°F · wind 10mph

Closing spread

GB -5.5

Total

41

Model margin

+2.8est.

GB perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Packers
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

Packers winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge mapPackers
  • -0.033EPA / play+0.075
  • 43.2%Success rate43.6%
  • -0.029EPA / dropback+0.184
  • -0.037EPA / rush-0.109
  • 10.4%Explosive rate8.6%
  • -0.23CPOE+4.25
  • 35.8%Third-down rate42.9%
  • 68.8%Red-zone TD rate61.0%
  • 1.51Points / drive2.16
  • 3.0%Turnover rate2.3%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

GB lead 31–24–2 since 1999

MIN have won 2 straight. Meetings average 46.8 points. GB are 28-29 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2026 · W1GB @ MIN2239MIN
2025 · W18GB @ MIN316MIN
2025 · W12MIN @ GB623GB
2024 · W17GB @ MIN2527MIN
2024 · W4MIN @ GB3129MIN
2023 · W17GB @ MIN3310GB
2023 · W8MIN @ GB2410MIN
2022 · W17MIN @ GB1741GB

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brooks Bollinger16/2617601

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson11454.10
Chester Taylor33712.30
Brooks Bollinger144.00

Packers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brett Favre33/4635130
Aaron Rodgers2/21700

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Ryan Grant251194.81
Brett Favre111.00
Brandon Jackson410.30
Aaron Rodgers2-1-0.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +5.53.9%2.6%6.9%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.0%2.7%

Positive margins favour Packers; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

3.12%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

56.6%

Expected total

43.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.08
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment-0.82
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+2.82