2007 · Week 14

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Rex Grossman

16·24

Commanders

Washington

QB Jason Campbell

FedExField · outdoors · grass · 26°F · wind 0mph

Closing spread

WAS -3

Total

39

Model margin

+7.0est.

WAS perspective

Push chance

7.2%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Commanders
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Commanders winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapCommanders
  • -0.128EPA / play-0.040
  • 38.4%Success rate41.8%
  • -0.087EPA / dropback+0.089
  • -0.190EPA / rush-0.199
  • 6.6%Explosive rate8.2%
  • -3.34CPOE+2.48
  • 34.3%Third-down rate41.1%
  • 49.0%Red-zone TD rate54.1%
  • 1.34Points / drive1.59
  • 3.0%Turnover rate2.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

WAS lead 10–5 since 1999

Meetings average 44.4 points. WAS are 10-5 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W6CHI @ WAS2524CHI
2024 · W8CHI @ WAS1518WAS
2023 · W5CHI @ WAS4020CHI
2022 · W6WAS @ CHI127WAS
2019 · W3CHI @ WAS3115CHI
2016 · W16WAS @ CHI4121WAS
2015 · W14WAS @ CHI2421WAS
2013 · W7CHI @ WAS4145WAS

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brian Griese27/4529512
Rex Grossman2/61400

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson17352.10
Garrett Wolfe3134.30
Brian Griese4123.00

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Todd Collins15/2022420
Jason Campbell10/1610000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Clinton Portis17362.10
Mike Sellers111.01
Todd Collins1-1-1.00
Jason Campbell2-2-1.00
Ladell Betts3-3-1.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +33.1%5.9%7.2%3.2%5.0%3.4%3.3%2.6%

Positive margins favour Commanders; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

7.24%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

67.5%

Expected total

42.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.83
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment+3.64
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+7.02