Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2007 · Week 14

Final

Vikings

Minnesota

QB Tarvaris Jackson

27·7

49ers

San Francisco

QB Trent Dilfer

Monster Park · outdoors · grass · 53°F · wind 6mph

Closing spread

MIN -7.5

Total

39

Model margin

-1.6est.

SF perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • 49ers
  • Vikings

How each play moved the game.

49ers winsVikings wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Vikingsedge map49ers
  • -0.033EPA / play-0.254
  • 43.2%Success rate36.7%
  • -0.029EPA / dropback-0.277
  • -0.037EPA / rush-0.213
  • 10.4%Explosive rate7.2%
  • -0.23CPOE-5.63
  • 35.8%Third-down rate31.5%
  • 68.8%Red-zone TD rate51.4%
  • 1.51Points / drive0.92
  • 3.0%Turnover rate3.4%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

MIN lead 8–4 since 1999

MIN have won 2 straight. Meetings average 39.3 points. SF are 5-7 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W2SF @ MIN1723MIN
2023 · W7SF @ MIN1722MIN
2021 · W12MIN @ SF2634SF
2019 · playoffsMIN @ SF1027SF
2018 · W1SF @ MIN1624MIN
2015 · W1MIN @ SF320SF
2012 · W3SF @ MIN1324MIN
2009 · W3SF @ MIN2427MIN

Box score

Individual performances

Vikings

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Tarvaris Jackson16/2516310

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Chester Taylor810112.61
Tarvaris Jackson9131.40
Adrian Peterson1430.20

49ers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Shaun Hill22/2818111
Trent Dilfer7/194501

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Frank Gore16684.30
Shaun Hill133.00
Trent Dilfer210.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -7.52.9%4.6%3.0%7.5%7.1%2.8%4.2%

Positive margins favour 49ers; negative favour Vikings.

Half-point at risk

4.63%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

44.8%

Expected total

41.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-4.15
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-1.59