2010 · Week 2

Final

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Derek Anderson

7·41

Falcons

Atlanta

QB Matt Ryan

Georgia Dome · dome · fieldturf

Closing spread

ATL -7

Total

43

Model margin

+6.1est.

ATL perspective

Push chance

5.0%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Falcons
  • Cardinals

How each play moved the game.

Falcons winsCardinals wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Cardinalsedge mapFalcons
  • -0.220EPA / play+0.066
  • 37.1%Success rate43.3%
  • -0.248EPA / dropback+0.161
  • -0.165EPA / rush-0.066
  • 8.3%Explosive rate6.3%
  • -9.59CPOE+0.37
  • 27.4%Third-down rate46.9%
  • 45.0%Red-zone TD rate58.8%
  • 1.06Points / drive2.13
  • 3.1%Turnover rate1.4%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

ATL lead 11–5 since 1999

Meetings average 46.8 points. ATL are 9-7 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W16ATL @ ARI2619ATL
2023 · W10ATL @ ARI2325ARI
2022 · W17ARI @ ATL1920ATL
2019 · W6ATL @ ARI3334ARI
2018 · W15ARI @ ATL1440ATL
2016 · W12ARI @ ATL1938ATL
2014 · W13ARI @ ATL1829ATL
2013 · W8ATL @ ARI1327ARI

Box score

Individual performances

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Derek Anderson17/3116102
Max Hall1/2301

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Tim Hightower1111510.51
Jason Wright231.50

Falcons

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Ryan21/3222530

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Michael Turner9758.30
Matt Ryan661.00
Harry Douglas1-5-5.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Roddy White712781
Brian Finneran33311
Harry Douglas28310
Tony Gonzalez22190

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +73.3%6.1%7.4%3.2%5.0%3.3%3.2%

Positive margins favour Falcons; negative favour Cardinals.

Half-point at risk

4.98%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

65.3%

Expected total

42.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+3.66
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+6.14