2015 · Week 3 · Division

Final

Commanders

Washington

QB Kirk Cousins

21·32

Giants

New York

QB Eli Manning

MetLife Stadium · outdoors · fieldturf · 71°F · wind 4mph

Closing spread

NYG -3

Total

45

Model margin

+0.1est.

NYG perspective

Push chance

7.4%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Giants
  • Commanders

How each play moved the game.

Giants winsCommanders wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Commandersedge mapGiants
  • +0.022EPA / play+0.025
  • 42.6%Success rate44.0%
  • +0.166EPA / dropback+0.106
  • -0.191EPA / rush-0.119
  • 7.9%Explosive rate8.0%
  • +5.62CPOE-1.12
  • 43.9%Third-down rate37.1%
  • 61.3%Red-zone TD rate58.4%
  • 1.81Points / drive2.02
  • 1.9%Turnover rate1.9%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

NYG lead 32–21–1 since 1999

WAS have won 4 straight. Meetings average 39.8 points. NYG are 28-24-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W15WAS @ NYG2921WAS
2025 · W1NYG @ WAS621WAS
2024 · W9WAS @ NYG2722WAS
2024 · W2NYG @ WAS1821WAS
2023 · W11NYG @ WAS3119NYG
2023 · W7WAS @ NYG714NYG
2022 · W15NYG @ WAS2012NYG
2022 · W13WAS @ NYG2020Tie

Box score

Individual performances

Commanders

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Kirk Cousins30/4931612

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Matt Jones11383.50
Chris Thompson22914.50
Alfred Morris6193.20

Giants

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Eli Manning23/3227920

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Rashad Jennings11322.90
Andre Williams14292.11
Shane Vereen6233.80

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +32.7%4.4%2.9%7.3%7.4%2.9%4.4%2.7%

Positive margins favour Giants; negative favour Commanders.

Half-point at risk

7.36%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

49.2%

Expected total

46.4est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.43
  • Home-field advantage+2.49
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+0.06