2016 · Week 1

Final

Patriots

New England

QB Jimmy Garoppolo

23·21

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Carson Palmer

University of Phoenix Stadium · closed · grass

Closing spread

ARI -9

Total

44.5

Model margin

+3.2est.

ARI perspective

Push chance

1.2%est.

Win probability

  • Cardinals
  • Patriots

How each play moved the game.

Cardinals winsPatriots wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Patriotsedge mapCardinals
  • +0.128EPA / play-0.005
  • 44.3%Success rate45.3%
  • +0.276EPA / dropback+0.043
  • -0.077EPA / rush-0.093
  • 8.6%Explosive rate8.5%
  • +2.98CPOE-0.78
  • 47.3%Third-down rate40.4%
  • 64.5%Red-zone TD rate65.4%
  • 2.47Points / drive1.89
  • 0.7%Turnover rate2.5%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

NE lead 6–2 since 1999

Meetings average 40.6 points. ARI are 2-6 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2024 · W15NE @ ARI1730ARI
2022 · W14NE @ ARI2713NE
2020 · W12ARI @ NE1720NE
2012 · W2ARI @ NE2018ARI
2008 · W16ARI @ NE747NE
2004 · W2NE @ ARI2312NE
1999 · W8NE @ ARI273NE

Box score

Individual performances

Patriots

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jimmy Garoppolo24/3326410

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
LeGarrette Blount22703.21
Julian Edelman3165.30
Jimmy Garoppolo4123.00
Brandon Bolden144.00
James White144.00

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Carson Palmer24/3727120

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
David Johnson16895.61
Chris Johnson122.00
Carson Palmer210.50

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +96.8%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.8%

Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour Patriots.

Half-point at risk

1.23%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

57.7%

Expected total

43.3est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.67
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment+3.16
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.24