2016 · Week 14

Final

Falcons

Atlanta

QB Matt Ryan

42·14

Rams

Los Angeles

QB Jared Goff

Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum · outdoors · grass · 65°F · wind 1mph

Closing spread

ATL -4.5

Total

44

Model margin

-8.8est.

LA perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Rams
  • Falcons

How each play moved the game.

Rams winsFalcons wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Falconsedge mapRams
  • +0.196EPA / play-0.203
  • 49.5%Success rate36.6%
  • +0.323EPA / dropback-0.222
  • +0.001EPA / rush-0.170
  • 11.2%Explosive rate6.8%
  • +6.59CPOE-6.92
  • 43.7%Third-down rate32.2%
  • 68.3%Red-zone TD rate47.6%
  • 2.93Points / drive0.97
  • 1.1%Turnover rate2.8%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

LA lead 10–8 since 1999

Meetings average 51.4 points. LA are 9-9 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W17LA @ ATL2427ATL
2022 · W2ATL @ LA2731RAMS
2019 · W7LA @ ATL3710RAMS
2017 · playoffsATL @ LA2613ATL
2013 · W2STL @ ATL2431ATL
2010 · W11ATL @ STL3417ATL
2008 · W17STL @ ATL2731ATL
2007 · W13ATL @ STL1628RAMS

Box score

Individual performances

Falcons

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Ryan18/2823730
Matt Schaub0/2000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Tevin Coleman8364.51
Terron Ward10242.40
Devonta Freeman661.00
Taylor Gabriel100.00

Rams

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jared Goff24/4123502

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Todd Gurley16613.81
Tavon Austin22713.50
Malcolm Brown4143.50
Jared Goff122.01

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Kenny Britt712820
Tavon Austin711620
Todd Gurley34220
Pharoh Cooper33220
Mike Thomas11160
Lance Kendricks13130
Brian Quick13100
Tyler Higbee1480

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -4.52.8%3.4%3.5%5.0%3.1%7.0%5.4%2.7%

Positive margins favour Rams; negative favour Falcons.

Half-point at risk

2.42%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

26.8%

Expected total

43.9est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-6.48
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment-4.02
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-8.76