Closing spread
BUF -10.5
Total
43.5
Model margin
+7.9est.
BUF perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Browns
- QuestionableDominique AlexanderLBAbdomen· Limited
- LimitedJamar TaylorCBGroin
Bills
- OutLerentee McCrayLBConcussion· DNP
- DoubtfulCordy GlennTBack· DNP
- QuestionableCharles ClayTEKnee· Limited
- QuestionableKyle WilliamsDTBack· Limited
- QuestionableSammy WatkinsWRFoot· Limited
- QuestionableZach BrownLBAnkle· Limited
- DNPJerry HughesLBAnkle
- DNPLorenzo AlexanderLBNot Injury Related
Win probability
- Bills
- Browns
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.050EPA / play+0.056
- 39.2%Success rate44.9%
- -0.011EPA / dropback+0.076
- -0.131EPA / rush+0.028
- 9.2%Explosive rate10.0%
- -1.42CPOE+0.94
- 36.2%Third-down rate41.7%
- 57.8%Red-zone TD rate68.0%
- 1.37Points / drive2.08
- 2.3%Turnover rate1.1%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
BUF lead 7–5 since 1999
BUF have won 2 straight. Meetings average 37.4 points. BUF are 6-5-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | CLE–BUF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLE | Q1 15:00 | 4 | 2 | Punt | 0–0 |
| BUF | Q1 13:20 | 6 | 44 | Field goal | 0–3 |
| CLE | Q1 10:14 | 12 | 60 | Field goal | 3–3 |
| BUF | Q1 3:50 | 8 | 74 | Punt | 3–10 |
| CLE | Q2 15:00 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 3–10 |
| BUF | Q2 12:34 | 6 | 16 | Punt | 3–10 |
| CLE | Q2 9:45 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 3–10 |
| BUF | Q2 8:03 | 14 | 101 | Touchdown | 3–17 |
| CLE | Q2 0:34 | 4 | 18 | End of half | 3–17 |
| BUF | Q3 15:00 | 5 | 18 | Punt | 3–17 |
| CLE | Q3 12:52 | 9 | 75 | Touchdown | 10–17 |
| BUF | Q3 8:58 | 6 | 60 | Touchdown | 10–24 |
| CLE | Q3 5:50 | 8 | 42 | Field goal | 13–24 |
| BUF | Q3 1:32 | 8 | 75 | Touchdown | 13–30 |
| CLE | Q4 12:38 | 3 | -9 | Punt | 13–30 |
| BUF | Q4 11:21 | 6 | 34 | Field goal | 13–33 |
| CLE | Q4 7:21 | 3 | -1 | Punt | 13–33 |
| BUF | Q4 6:00 | 8 | 29 | Turnover on downs | 13–33 |
| CLE | Q4 2:05 | 9 | 72 | End of half | 13–33 |
Box score
Individual performances
Browns
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Griffin III | 17/28 | 196 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Griffin III | 8 | 48 | 6.0 | 1 |
| Duke Johnson | 5 | 31 | 6.2 | 0 |
| Isaiah Crowell | 8 | 28 | 3.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke Johnson | 5 | 7 | 62 | 0 |
| Gary Barnidge | 2 | 3 | 35 | 0 |
| Andrew Hawkins | 1 | 1 | 33 | 0 |
| Corey Coleman | 3 | 4 | 24 | 0 |
| Terrelle Pryor | 4 | 8 | 19 | 0 |
| Danny Vitale | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0 |
| Seth DeValve | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| Isaiah Crowell | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Bills
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyrod Taylor | 17/24 | 174 | 1 | 0 |
| EJ Manuel | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LeSean McCoy | 19 | 153 | 8.1 | 2 |
| Tyrod Taylor | 7 | 49 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Mike Gillislee | 9 | 37 | 4.1 | 1 |
| Brandon Tate | 1 | 30 | 30.0 | 0 |
| Jonathan Williams | 3 | 10 | 3.3 | 0 |
| EJ Manuel | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles Clay | 7 | 7 | 72 | 1 |
| Marquise Goodwin | 3 | 4 | 43 | 0 |
| LeSean McCoy | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 |
| Justin Hunter | 1 | 3 | 16 | 0 |
| Sammy Watkins | 1 | 4 | 10 | 0 |
| Robert Woods | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 |
| Nick O'Leary | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bills; negative favour Browns.
Half-point at risk
1.67%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
69.6%
Expected total
45.0est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+3.06
- Home-field advantage+1.74
- Quarterback adjustment+3.10
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+7.91



