Closing spread
PIT -3
Total
45.5
Model margin
+1.1est.
CIN perspective
Push chance
7.2%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Steelers
- OutDarrius Heyward-BeyWRFoot· DNP
- OutShamarko ThomasSConcussion· DNP
- DNPBen RoethlisbergerQBNot Injury Related
- DNPMaurkice PounceyCNot Injury Related
Bengals
- DoubtfulA.J. GreenWRHamstring· Limited
- DoubtfulWallace GilberryDECalf· DNP
- QuestionableC.J. UzomahTECalf· Full
- QuestionableClark HarrisLSGroin· Full
- QuestionableDerron SmithSThigh· Full
- QuestionableJames WrightWRKnee· Full
- DNPMargus HuntDENot Injury Related
Win probability
- Bengals
- Steelers
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.085EPA / play+0.052
- 46.0%Success rate45.3%
- +0.164EPA / dropback+0.116
- -0.043EPA / rush-0.050
- 10.8%Explosive rate7.8%
- +1.74CPOE+2.98
- 41.9%Third-down rate38.9%
- 64.0%Red-zone TD rate58.5%
- 2.24Points / drive1.86
- 1.7%Turnover rate1.4%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
PIT lead 41–16 since 1999
PIT have won 2 straight. Meetings average 42.4 points. CIN are 18-38-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | PIT–CIN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | Q1 15:00 | 14 | 55 | Field goal | 0–3 |
| PIT | Q1 7:39 | 6 | 28 | Field goal | 3–3 |
| CIN | Q1 3:42 | 9 | 25 | Touchdown | 3–10 |
| PIT | Q2 15:00 | 4 | 17 | Punt | 3–10 |
| CIN | Q2 13:18 | 10 | 82 | Touchdown | 3–17 |
| PIT | Q2 9:02 | 8 | 50 | Field goal | 6–17 |
| CIN | Q2 5:25 | 6 | 22 | Field goal | 6–20 |
| PIT | Q2 2:51 | 10 | 59 | Field goal | 9–20 |
| CIN | Q2 0:06 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 9–20 |
| PIT | Q3 15:00 | 8 | 58 | Field goal | 12–20 |
| CIN | Q3 10:38 | 8 | 18 | Punt | 12–20 |
| PIT | Q3 6:23 | 8 | 39 | Field goal | 15–20 |
| CIN | Q3 2:05 | 4 | 11 | Turnover | 15–20 |
| PIT | Q3 0:01 | 6 | 32 | Field goal | 18–20 |
| CIN | Q4 12:25 | 3 | -1 | Punt | 18–20 |
| PIT | Q4 10:51 | 9 | 40 | Touchdown | 24–20 |
| CIN | Q4 7:29 | 4 | 10 | Punt | 24–20 |
| PIT | Q4 5:53 | 11 | 64 | End of half | 24–20 |
Box score
Individual performances
Steelers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ben Roethlisberger | 21/36 | 286 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Le'Veon Bell | 23 | 93 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Sammie Coates | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 |
| Ben Roethlisberger | 4 | -5 | -1.3 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eli Rogers | 5 | 6 | 75 | 1 |
| Ladarius Green | 5 | 8 | 72 | 0 |
| Antonio Brown | 3 | 5 | 58 | 0 |
| Le'Veon Bell | 5 | 8 | 38 | 0 |
| Cobi Hamilton | 1 | 2 | 21 | 0 |
| David Johnson | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 |
| Sammie Coates | 1 | 4 | 10 | 0 |
| Jesse James | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bengals
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andy Dalton | 16/27 | 157 | 0 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Hill | 20 | 43 | 2.1 | 1 |
| Rex Burkhead | 7 | 32 | 4.6 | 0 |
| Andy Dalton | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 1 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brandon LaFell | 7 | 9 | 91 | 0 |
| Rex Burkhead | 2 | 3 | 18 | 0 |
| Cody Core | 2 | 3 | 13 | 0 |
| Tyler Boyd | 2 | 3 | 13 | 0 |
| Tyler Eifert | 1 | 3 | 9 | 0 |
| Jeremy Hill | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
| James Wright | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Steelers.
Half-point at risk
7.21%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
52.1%
Expected total
44.6est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.60
- Home-field advantage+1.74
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+1.14



