Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2016 · Week 17 · Division

Final

Texans

Houston

QB Brock Osweiler

17·24

Titans

Tennessee

QB Matt Cassel

Nissan Stadium · outdoors · grass · 52°F · wind 7mph

Closing spread

TEN -3

Total

41.5

Model margin

-1.0est.

TEN perspective

Push chance

7.2%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Titans
  • Texans

How each play moved the game.

Titans winsTexans wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Texansedge mapTitans
  • -0.079EPA / play+0.037
  • 41.9%Success rate45.5%
  • -0.029EPA / dropback+0.103
  • -0.154EPA / rush-0.049
  • 6.9%Explosive rate10.3%
  • -3.29CPOE+1.12
  • 36.9%Third-down rate45.6%
  • 42.0%Red-zone TD rate75.2%
  • 1.45Points / drive1.72
  • 1.9%Turnover rate1.7%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

All square 24–24 since 1999

HOU have won 3 straight. Meetings average 43.7 points. TEN are 19-28-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W11HOU @ TEN1613HOU
2025 · W4TEN @ HOU026HOU
2024 · W18HOU @ TEN2314HOU
2024 · W12TEN @ HOU3227TEN
2023 · W17TEN @ HOU326HOU
2023 · W15HOU @ TEN1916HOU
2022 · W16HOU @ TEN1914HOU
2022 · W8TEN @ HOU1710TEN

Box score

Individual performances

Texans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Brock Osweiler21/4025310
Tom Savage5/82500

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Alfred Blue11282.50
Jonathan Grimes8162.00
Brock Osweiler111.01
Tom Savage210.50

Titans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Matt Cassel16/2615011

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Derrick Henry15654.31
DeMarco Murray11211.90
Marc Mariani11515.00
Matt Cassel221.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Rishard Matthews9131141
Delanie Walker58350
Derrick Henry1130
Tajae Sharpe0200
DeMarco Murray11-20

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +32.8%4.6%3.0%7.4%7.2%2.8%4.2%

Positive margins favour Titans; negative favour Texans.

Half-point at risk

7.22%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

46.3%

Expected total

43.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.08
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment-2.68
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-1.02