Closing spread
HOU -8
Total
40.5
Model margin
+0.7est.
HOU perspective
Push chance
2.0%est.
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Titans
- OutJack GibbensLBAnkle· DNP
- OutL'Jarius SneedCBQuadricep· DNP
- OutLeroy WatsonTBack· DNP
- OutTyjae SpearsRBConcussion· Limited
- QuestionableJustin HardeeCBGroin· Limited
- QuestionableRoger McCrearyCBKnee· Limited
Texans
- OutBlake FisherTConcussion· DNP
- OutFolorunso FatukasiDTFoot· DNP
- QuestionableDenico AutryDEKnee· DNP
Win probability
- Texans
- Titans
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.104EPA / play-0.038
- 40.4%Success rate39.1%
- -0.056EPA / dropback+0.008
- -0.175EPA / rush-0.120
- 8.3%Explosive rate8.3%
- +0.11CPOE-2.77
- 38.0%Third-down rate38.2%
- 58.5%Red-zone TD rate54.6%
- 1.35Points / drive1.84
- 3.0%Turnover rate1.6%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
HOU lead 25–24 since 1999
HOU have won 4 straight. Meetings average 43.4 points. HOU are 29-19-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | TEN–HOU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOU | Q1 15:00 | 1 | 19 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| TEN | Q1 14:42 | 5 | 28 | Field goal | 3–7 |
| HOU | Q1 11:15 | 6 | 12 | Punt | 3–7 |
| TEN | Q1 7:56 | 10 | 89 | Touchdown | 10–7 |
| HOU | Q1 1:57 | 4 | 18 | Punt | 10–7 |
| TEN | Q2 14:47 | 6 | 100 | Touchdown | 17–7 |
| HOU | Q2 11:03 | 10 | 73 | Touchdown | 17–14 |
| TEN | Q2 6:17 | 6 | 23 | Turnover | 17–14 |
| HOU | Q2 3:24 | 4 | 55 | Field goal | 17–17 |
| TEN | Q2 1:47 | 4 | 26 | Punt | 17–17 |
| HOU | Q2 0:45 | 2 | 0 | Turnover | 17–17 |
| TEN | Q2 0:37 | 3 | -18 | Field goal | 20–17 |
| TEN | Q3 15:00 | 11 | 39 | Field goal | 23–17 |
| HOU | Q3 9:08 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 23–17 |
| TEN | Q3 6:59 | 6 | 12 | Punt | 23–17 |
| HOU | Q3 2:19 | 2 | 0 | Turnover | 23–17 |
| TEN | Q3 1:30 | 3 | -1 | Opp touchdown | 23–24 |
| TEN | Q3 0:04 | 4 | 3 | Punt | 23–24 |
| HOU | Q4 12:58 | 3 | -5 | Punt | 23–24 |
| HOU | Q4 11:24 | 3 | 7 | Field goal | 23–27 |
| TEN | Q4 9:46 | 1 | 70 | Touchdown | 30–27 |
| HOU | Q4 9:35 | 7 | 26 | Punt | 30–27 |
| TEN | Q4 6:17 | 3 | -4 | Punt | 30–27 |
| HOU | Q4 5:22 | 8 | 54 | Missed field goal | 30–27 |
| TEN | Q4 1:53 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 30–27 |
| HOU | Q4 1:29 | 3 | -8 | Safety | 32–27 |
| TEN | Q4 1:13 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 32–27 |
Box score
Individual performances
Titans
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Will Levis | 18/24 | 278 | 2 | 1 |
| Tyler Boyd | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tony Pollard | 24 | 119 | 5.0 | 1 |
| Will Levis | 8 | 10 | 1.3 | 0 |
| Julius Chestnut | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calvin Ridley | 5 | 6 | 93 | 0 |
| Chig Okonkwo | 1 | 1 | 70 | 1 |
| Tyler Boyd | 6 | 6 | 55 | 0 |
| Nick Westbrook-Ikhine | 2 | 5 | 48 | 1 |
| Tony Pollard | 3 | 5 | 10 | 0 |
| Julius Chestnut | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Nick Vannett | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Texans
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.J. Stroud | 20/33 | 247 | 2 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joe Mixon | 14 | 22 | 1.6 | 0 |
| C.J. Stroud | 3 | 18 | 6.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nico Collins | 5 | 9 | 92 | 1 |
| Tank Dell | 3 | 5 | 72 | 0 |
| Cade Stover | 3 | 4 | 26 | 1 |
| Joe Mixon | 5 | 6 | 23 | 0 |
| Dalton Schultz | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 |
| Robert Woods | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
| John Metchie III | 1 | 3 | 6 | 0 |
| Xavier Hutchinson | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Texans; negative favour Titans.
Half-point at risk
1.97%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
50.9%
Expected total
43.0est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.24
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment-3.18
- Rest differential-0.08
- Expected margin+0.68



