2017 · Week 2

Final

Bears

Chicago

QB Mike Glennon

7·29

Buccaneers

Tampa Bay

QB Jameis Winston

Raymond James Stadium · outdoors · grass · 88°F · wind 7mph

Closing spread

TB -7

Total

44

Model margin

+2.4est.

TB perspective

Push chance

4.7%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Buccaneers
  • Bears

How each play moved the game.

Buccaneers winsBears wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Bearsedge mapBuccaneers
  • -0.112EPA / play+0.004
  • 38.5%Success rate44.2%
  • -0.099EPA / dropback+0.090
  • -0.130EPA / rush-0.167
  • 7.7%Explosive rate6.5%
  • -3.10CPOE+3.38
  • 34.8%Third-down rate42.9%
  • 61.2%Red-zone TD rate57.7%
  • 1.22Points / drive1.79
  • 2.1%Turnover rate2.5%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

All square 10–10 since 1999

TB have won 2 straight. Meetings average 37.4 points. TB are 10-10 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W2CHI @ TB1727TB
2021 · W7CHI @ TB338TB
2020 · W5TB @ CHI1920CHI
2018 · W4TB @ CHI1048CHI
2016 · W10CHI @ TB1036TB
2015 · W16CHI @ TB2621CHI
2014 · W12TB @ CHI1321CHI
2011 · W7CHI @ TB2418CHI

Box score

Individual performances

Bears

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Mike Glennon31/4530112

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Tarik Cohen7131.90
Jordan Howard970.80

Buccaneers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jameis Winston18/3020410
Ryan Fitzpatrick0/1000

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Jacquizz Rodgers19673.51
Peyton Barber10474.70
Jameis Winston133.00
Charles Sims221.00
Ryan Fitzpatrick2-2-1.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +74.0%2.7%7.0%7.5%3.1%4.7%3.0%2.6%

Positive margins favour Buccaneers; negative favour Bears.

Half-point at risk

4.73%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

55.6%

Expected total

45.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.65
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment-0.52
  • Rest differential+0.56
  • Expected margin+2.44