2017 · Week 6

Final

Buccaneers

Tampa Bay

QB Jameis Winston

33·38

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Carson Palmer

University of Phoenix Stadium · closed · grass

Closing spread

TB -2.5

Total

46.5

Model margin

+2.2est.

ARI perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Cardinals
  • Buccaneers

How each play moved the game.

Cardinals winsBuccaneers wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Buccaneersedge mapCardinals
  • +0.004EPA / play-0.129
  • 44.2%Success rate38.8%
  • +0.090EPA / dropback-0.086
  • -0.167EPA / rush-0.207
  • 6.5%Explosive rate7.2%
  • +3.38CPOE-4.25
  • 42.9%Third-down rate35.7%
  • 57.7%Red-zone TD rate52.2%
  • 1.79Points / drive1.20
  • 2.5%Turnover rate2.3%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

TB lead 5–4 since 1999

TB have won 3 straight. Meetings average 43.2 points. ARI are 7-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W13ARI @ TB1720TB
2022 · W16TB @ ARI1916TB
2019 · W10ARI @ TB2730TB
2016 · W2TB @ ARI740ARI
2013 · W4ARI @ TB1310ARI
2010 · W8TB @ ARI3835TB
2007 · W9ARI @ TB1017TB
2004 · W17TB @ ARI712ARI

Box score

Individual performances

Buccaneers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Ryan Fitzpatrick22/3229032
Jameis Winston5/106100

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Doug Martin14533.81
Ryan Fitzpatrick2126.00
Bernard Reedy144.00
Jacquizz Rodgers310.30

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Carson Palmer18/2228331

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Adrian Peterson261345.22
J.J. Nelson11616.00
Kerwynn Williams3144.70
Carson Palmer5-4-0.80

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Larry Fitzgerald10111381
John Brown34631
Jermaine Gresham22320
Jaron Brown11300
Troy Niklas22201
Andre Ellington0100
J.J. Nelson0100

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -2.54.0%2.7%7.0%7.5%3.1%4.7%3.0%

Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour Buccaneers.

Half-point at risk

2.05%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

54.9%

Expected total

43.6est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+0.68
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-0.24
  • Expected margin+2.18