2018 · Week 16 · Division

Final

Rams

Los Angeles

QB Jared Goff

31·9

Cardinals

Arizona

QB Josh Rosen

State Farm Stadium · closed · grass

Closing spread

LA -14.5

Total

43

Model margin

-3.5est.

ARI perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Cardinals
  • Rams

How each play moved the game.

Cardinals winsRams wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Ramsedge mapCardinals
  • +0.149EPA / play-0.240
  • 50.8%Success rate35.6%
  • +0.203EPA / dropback-0.267
  • +0.065EPA / rush-0.193
  • 12.1%Explosive rate6.0%
  • +1.24CPOE-7.13
  • 45.0%Third-down rate29.0%
  • 57.8%Red-zone TD rate63.9%
  • 2.63Points / drive0.92
  • 1.7%Turnover rate3.0%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

LA lead 29–20 since 1999

RAMS have won 3 straight. Meetings average 43 points. ARI are 23-25-1 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W18ARI @ LA2037RAMS
2025 · W14LA @ ARI4517RAMS
2024 · W17ARI @ LA913RAMS
2024 · W2LA @ ARI1041ARI
2023 · W12LA @ ARI3714RAMS
2023 · W6ARI @ LA926RAMS
2022 · W10ARI @ LA2717ARI
2022 · W3LA @ ARI2012RAMS

Box score

Individual performances

Rams

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Jared Goff19/2421610

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
C.J. Anderson201678.31
John Kelly10404.00
Brandin Cooks3279.00
Gerald Everett2168.00
Robert Woods2157.51
Jared Goff263.01
Sean Mannion2-2-1.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Robert Woods67891
Josh Reynolds22440
Brandin Cooks33350
Gerald Everett56280
Tyler Higbee11160
John Kelly1190
C.J. Anderson13-50

Cardinals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Josh Rosen12/238700
Mike Glennon5/76300
Larry Fitzgerald1/13210

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Josh Rosen44912.30
David Johnson10353.50
Chase Edmonds4205.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -14.52.8%3.1%4.8%3.1%7.5%

Positive margins favour Cardinals; negative favour Rams.

Half-point at risk

2.79%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

39.8%

Expected total

43.5est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-5.23
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin-3.49