Closing spread
LAC -3
Total
49
Model margin
+3.0est.
LAC perspective
Push chance
7.5%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Texans
- QuestionableLaremy TunsilTAnkle· Limited
- QuestionableSenio KelemeteGWrist· Limited
- QuestionableTaiwan JonesRBHamstring· Limited
Chargers
- OutHunter HenryTEKnee· DNP
- DoubtfulMichael DavisCBHamstring· DNP
- QuestionableMichael BadgleyKright Groin· Full
Win probability
- Chargers
- Texans
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.057EPA / play+0.036
- 45.6%Success rate47.3%
- +0.132EPA / dropback+0.118
- -0.071EPA / rush-0.118
- 8.7%Explosive rate9.0%
- +1.12CPOE+3.58
- 43.7%Third-down rate45.5%
- 70.6%Red-zone TD rate57.1%
- 2.18Points / drive1.99
- 2.0%Turnover rate2.8%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
LAC lead 6–5 since 1999
HOU have won 2 straight. Meetings average 47.2 points. LAC are 7-4 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | HOU–LAC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAC | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 0–0 |
| HOU | Q1 12:45 | 4 | -3 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| LAC | Q1 11:09 | 3 | 15 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| HOU | Q1 9:41 | 10 | 39 | Punt | 0–7 |
| LAC | Q1 4:13 | 16 | 87 | Field goal | 0–10 |
| HOU | Q2 10:32 | 5 | 61 | Touchdown | 7–10 |
| LAC | Q2 8:11 | 5 | 24 | Punt | 7–10 |
| HOU | Q2 5:05 | 7 | 37 | Punt | 7–10 |
| LAC | Q2 1:40 | 10 | 54 | Touchdown | 7–17 |
| HOU | Q2 0:22 | 2 | 37 | Missed field goal | 7–17 |
| HOU | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 7–17 |
| LAC | Q3 12:55 | 3 | -8 | Punt | 7–17 |
| HOU | Q3 11:08 | 8 | 55 | Touchdown | 14–17 |
| LAC | Q3 7:31 | 7 | 45 | Turnover | 14–17 |
| HOU | Q3 3:43 | 7 | 58 | Touchdown | 21–17 |
| LAC | Q3 1:19 | 7 | 35 | Punt | 21–17 |
| HOU | Q4 13:28 | 8 | 82 | Touchdown | 27–17 |
| LAC | Q4 9:40 | 5 | 50 | Field goal | 27–20 |
| HOU | Q4 7:14 | 4 | 3 | Punt | 27–20 |
| LAC | Q4 4:19 | 15 | 60 | Turnover on downs | 27–20 |
| HOU | Q4 0:11 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 27–20 |
Box score
Individual performances
Texans
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deshaun Watson | 25/34 | 351 | 3 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Hyde | 10 | 19 | 1.9 | 1 |
| Deshaun Watson | 7 | 18 | 2.6 | 0 |
| Duke Johnson | 2 | 2 | 1.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenny Stills | 4 | 6 | 89 | 0 |
| Jordan Akins | 3 | 5 | 73 | 2 |
| DeAndre Hopkins | 6 | 7 | 67 | 0 |
| Will Fuller | 5 | 7 | 51 | 0 |
| Darren Fells | 5 | 6 | 49 | 1 |
| Duke Johnson | 2 | 3 | 22 | 0 |
Chargers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philip Rivers | 31/46 | 318 | 2 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austin Ekeler | 9 | 36 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Justin Jackson | 5 | 26 | 5.2 | 0 |
| Philip Rivers | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 |
| Keenan Allen | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keenan Allen | 13 | 17 | 183 | 2 |
| Mike Williams | 3 | 7 | 45 | 0 |
| Austin Ekeler | 7 | 7 | 45 | 0 |
| Dontrelle Inman | 1 | 3 | 23 | 0 |
| Lance Kendricks | 1 | 2 | 13 | 0 |
| Travis Benjamin | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
| Justin Jackson | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| Sean Culkin | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Chargers; negative favour Texans.
Half-point at risk
7.52%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
57.2%
Expected total
45.8est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.30
- Home-field advantage+1.74
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+3.04



