Task Enterprises presentsNFL Intelligence

2019 · Week 3

Final

Texans

Houston

QB Deshaun Watson

27·20

Chargers

Los Angeles

QB Philip Rivers

StubHub Center · outdoors · grass · 87°F · wind 4mph

Closing spread

LAC -3

Total

49

Model margin

+3.0est.

LAC perspective

Push chance

7.5%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Chargers
  • Texans

How each play moved the game.

Chargers winsTexans wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Texansedge mapChargers
  • +0.057EPA / play+0.036
  • 45.6%Success rate47.3%
  • +0.132EPA / dropback+0.118
  • -0.071EPA / rush-0.118
  • 8.7%Explosive rate9.0%
  • +1.12CPOE+3.58
  • 43.7%Third-down rate45.5%
  • 70.6%Red-zone TD rate57.1%
  • 2.18Points / drive1.99
  • 2.0%Turnover rate2.8%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

LAC lead 6–5 since 1999

HOU have won 2 straight. Meetings average 47.2 points. LAC are 7-4 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W17HOU @ LAC2016HOU
2024 · playoffsLAC @ HOU1232HOU
2022 · W4LAC @ HOU3424CHARGERS
2021 · W16LAC @ HOU2941HOU
2016 · W12SD @ HOU2113CHARGERS
2013 · W1HOU @ SD3128HOU
2010 · W9SD @ HOU2923CHARGERS
2007 · W8HOU @ SD1035CHARGERS

Box score

Individual performances

Texans

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Deshaun Watson25/3435130

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Carlos Hyde10191.91
Deshaun Watson7182.60
Duke Johnson221.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Kenny Stills46890
Jordan Akins35732
DeAndre Hopkins67670
Will Fuller57510
Darren Fells56491
Duke Johnson23220

Chargers

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Philip Rivers31/4631820

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Austin Ekeler9364.00
Justin Jackson5265.20
Philip Rivers294.50
Keenan Allen133.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +33.9%6.9%7.5%3.1%4.8%3.1%2.7%

Positive margins favour Chargers; negative favour Texans.

Half-point at risk

7.52%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

57.2%

Expected total

45.8est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.30
  • Home-field advantage+1.74
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+3.04