Closing spread
TEN -3
Total
50
Model margin
+4.7est.
TEN perspective
Push chance
7.5%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Texans
- QuestionableBrennan ScarlettLBAchilles· Limited
- QuestionableTaiwan JonesRBHamstring· Limited
- QuestionableWill FullerWRHamstring· Limited
Titans
- OutAdam HumphriesWRAnkle· DNP
- OutAdoree' JacksonCBFoot· DNP
- OutDaren BatesLBShoulder· DNP
- QuestionableDerrick HenryRBHamstring· DNP
- QuestionableKenny VaccaroSConcussion· Full
- LimitedJayon BrownLBHip
Win probability
- Titans
- Texans
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.057EPA / play+0.063
- 45.6%Success rate45.7%
- +0.132EPA / dropback+0.143
- -0.071EPA / rush-0.046
- 8.7%Explosive rate11.6%
- +1.12CPOE+3.45
- 43.7%Third-down rate39.4%
- 70.6%Red-zone TD rate74.8%
- 2.18Points / drive1.99
- 2.0%Turnover rate1.6%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
HOU lead 25–24 since 1999
HOU have won 4 straight. Meetings average 43.4 points. TEN are 19-29-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | HOU–TEN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOU | Q1 15:00 | 10 | 54 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| TEN | Q1 9:28 | 7 | 67 | Missed field goal | 0–0 |
| HOU | Q1 6:59 | 5 | 17 | Punt | 0–0 |
| TEN | Q1 5:04 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 0–0 |
| HOU | Q1 4:06 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 0–0 |
| TEN | Q1 1:45 | 12 | 76 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| HOU | Q2 10:46 | 2 | 12 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| TEN | Q2 9:59 | 3 | 4 | Punt | 7–0 |
| HOU | Q2 7:49 | 9 | 57 | Touchdown | 14–0 |
| TEN | Q2 3:14 | 9 | 45 | Turnover on downs | 14–0 |
| HOU | Q2 1:08 | 5 | 15 | Punt | 14–0 |
| TEN | Q2 0:01 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 14–0 |
| TEN | Q3 15:00 | 15 | 81 | Touchdown | 14–7 |
| HOU | Q3 5:34 | 8 | 60 | Turnover | 14–7 |
| TEN | Q3 0:39 | 6 | 73 | Touchdown | 14–14 |
| HOU | Q4 13:35 | 7 | 70 | Touchdown | 21–14 |
| TEN | Q4 10:34 | 4 | 16 | Punt | 21–14 |
| HOU | Q4 8:46 | 11 | 85 | Field goal | 24–14 |
| TEN | Q4 3:26 | 7 | 75 | Touchdown | 24–21 |
| HOU | Q4 2:04 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 24–21 |
| TEN | Q4 0:17 | 1 | -8 | End of half | 24–21 |
Box score
Individual performances
Texans
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deshaun Watson | 19/27 | 243 | 2 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Hyde | 26 | 104 | 4.0 | 1 |
| Deshaun Watson | 7 | 32 | 4.6 | 0 |
| Duke Johnson | 2 | 4 | 2.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeAndre Hopkins | 6 | 8 | 119 | 0 |
| Will Fuller | 5 | 7 | 61 | 0 |
| Kenny Stills | 3 | 3 | 35 | 2 |
| Duke Johnson | 2 | 3 | 19 | 0 |
| Jordan Akins | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
| Darren Fells | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Titans
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryan Tannehill | 22/36 | 279 | 2 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derrick Henry | 21 | 86 | 4.1 | 0 |
| Jonnu Smith | 1 | 57 | 57.0 | 0 |
| Dion Lewis | 3 | 10 | 3.3 | 0 |
| Ryan Tannehill | 3 | 10 | 3.3 | 1 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A.J. Brown | 8 | 13 | 114 | 1 |
| Jonnu Smith | 5 | 5 | 60 | 0 |
| Corey Davis | 3 | 6 | 57 | 0 |
| Tajae Sharpe | 2 | 2 | 28 | 0 |
| Dion Lewis | 1 | 1 | 11 | 1 |
| Anthony Firkser | 1 | 4 | 7 | 0 |
| Kalif Raymond | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Derrick Henry | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Titans; negative favour Texans.
Half-point at risk
7.48%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
61.5%
Expected total
46.3est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.91
- Home-field advantage+1.74
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+4.65



