Closing spread
BUF -4.5
Total
51
Model margin
+4.0est.
BUF perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Chargers
- OutCasey HaywardCBGroin· DNP
- OutMelvin IngramDEKnee· DNP
- OutUchenna NwosuDEShoulder· DNP
- QuestionableKalen BallageRBAnkle· Limited
Bills
- OutCody FordTAnkle· DNP
- OutJohn BrownWRAnkle· DNP
- DNPLee SmithTEIllness
- DNPMario AddisonDEKnee
- LimitedJake FrommQBNot Injury Related
Win probability
- Bills
- Chargers
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.043EPA / play+0.169
- 43.8%Success rate50.4%
- +0.154EPA / dropback+0.298
- -0.141EPA / rush-0.081
- 7.9%Explosive rate10.7%
- +0.07CPOE+6.29
- 45.1%Third-down rate49.9%
- 60.1%Red-zone TD rate68.4%
- 2.02Points / drive2.78
- 1.3%Turnover rate1.9%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
LAC lead 7–6 since 1999
BUF have won 3 straight. Meetings average 47.2 points. BUF are 6-7 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | LAC–BUF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAC | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 0–0 |
| BUF | Q1 14:25 | 5 | 16 | Touchdown | 0–7 |
| LAC | Q1 12:26 | 13 | 79 | Touchdown | 6–7 |
| BUF | Q1 6:31 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 6–7 |
| LAC | Q1 4:13 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 6–7 |
| BUF | Q1 3:25 | 4 | 1 | Punt | 6–7 |
| LAC | Q1 1:21 | 6 | 20 | Punt | 6–7 |
| BUF | Q2 14:05 | 8 | 61 | Touchdown | 6–14 |
| LAC | Q2 9:44 | 5 | 12 | Punt | 6–14 |
| BUF | Q2 7:31 | 11 | 50 | Field goal | 6–17 |
| LAC | Q2 2:16 | 7 | 33 | Punt | 6–17 |
| BUF | Q2 0:12 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 6–17 |
| BUF | Q3 15:00 | 12 | 53 | Touchdown | 6–24 |
| LAC | Q3 9:02 | 10 | 67 | Touchdown | 14–24 |
| BUF | Q3 4:51 | 4 | 11 | Punt | 14–24 |
| LAC | Q3 2:11 | 7 | 39 | Turnover on downs | 14–24 |
| BUF | Q4 14:53 | 2 | 19 | Turnover | 14–24 |
| LAC | Q4 14:06 | 7 | 16 | Field goal | 17–24 |
| BUF | Q4 10:16 | 2 | 44 | Turnover | 17–24 |
| LAC | Q4 9:46 | 3 | -2 | Punt | 17–24 |
| BUF | Q4 8:14 | 4 | 8 | Turnover | 17–24 |
| LAC | Q4 6:13 | 3 | 4 | Turnover | 17–24 |
| BUF | Q4 5:17 | 6 | 65 | Field goal | 17–27 |
| LAC | Q4 3:26 | 15 | 97 | End of half | 17–27 |
Box score
Individual performances
Chargers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Herbert | 31/52 | 316 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austin Ekeler | 14 | 44 | 3.1 | 0 |
| Joshua Kelley | 7 | 35 | 5.0 | 1 |
| Troymaine Pope | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 |
| Justin Herbert | 2 | -2 | -1.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austin Ekeler | 11 | 16 | 85 | 0 |
| Hunter Henry | 7 | 10 | 67 | 0 |
| Tyron Johnson | 2 | 4 | 63 | 0 |
| Keenan Allen | 4 | 10 | 40 | 1 |
| Jalen Guyton | 3 | 4 | 33 | 0 |
| Mike Williams | 3 | 5 | 26 | 0 |
| Troymaine Pope | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Donald Parham | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bills
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Allen | 18/24 | 157 | 1 | 1 |
| Cole Beasley | 1/1 | 20 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devin Singletary | 11 | 82 | 7.5 | 0 |
| Zack Moss | 9 | 59 | 6.6 | 0 |
| Josh Allen | 9 | 32 | 3.6 | 1 |
| Isaiah McKenzie | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gabe Davis | 3 | 4 | 79 | 1 |
| Stefon Diggs | 7 | 9 | 39 | 0 |
| Cole Beasley | 2 | 4 | 25 | 0 |
| Devin Singletary | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 |
| Zack Moss | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 |
| Lee Smith | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Dawson Knox | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bills; negative favour Chargers.
Half-point at risk
1.97%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
59.9%
Expected total
44.6est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.78
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential+0.56
- Expected margin+4.05



