Closing spread
KC -2.5
Total
53.5
Model margin
-1.6est.
LV perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Chiefs
- OutLucas NiangTRibs· DNP
- OutMike RemmersTKnee· DNP
- QuestionableL'Jarius SneedCBAnkle· Full
Raiders
- OutNick KwiatkoskiLBAnkle· DNP
- OutTyree GillespieSHamstring· DNP
- DoubtfulAmik RobertsonCBHip· DNP
- DoubtfulKeisean NixonCBAnkle· DNP
Win probability
- Raiders
- Chiefs
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.140EPA / play-0.001
- 51.1%Success rate45.2%
- +0.216EPA / dropback+0.089
- -0.024EPA / rush-0.161
- 8.3%Explosive rate9.2%
- +2.81CPOE+1.92
- 52.1%Third-down rate36.8%
- 60.0%Red-zone TD rate53.8%
- 2.66Points / drive1.87
- 2.0%Turnover rate2.1%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
KC lead 36–19 since 1999
Meetings average 44.5 points. LV are 28-26-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | KC–LV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KC | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 11 | Punt | 0–0 |
| LV | Q1 12:32 | 6 | 23 | Punt | 0–0 |
| KC | Q1 8:36 | 11 | 89 | Touchdown | 7–0 |
| LV | Q1 2:51 | 3 | 10 | Punt | 7–0 |
| LV | Q1 0:30 | 6 | 36 | Touchdown | 7–7 |
| KC | Q2 12:57 | 8 | 53 | Field goal | 10–7 |
| LV | Q2 8:24 | 4 | 6 | Punt | 10–7 |
| KC | Q2 5:58 | 10 | 54 | Touchdown | 17–7 |
| LV | Q2 1:39 | 3 | 7 | Punt | 17–7 |
| KC | Q2 0:52 | 7 | 34 | Missed field goal | 17–7 |
| LV | Q3 15:00 | 5 | 75 | Touchdown | 17–14 |
| KC | Q3 12:08 | 13 | 62 | Touchdown | 24–14 |
| LV | Q3 7:09 | 3 | 63 | Turnover | 24–14 |
| KC | Q3 5:34 | 8 | 66 | Field goal | 27–14 |
| LV | Q3 0:57 | 3 | 3 | Turnover | 27–14 |
| KC | Q3 0:10 | 7 | 56 | Touchdown | 34–14 |
| LV | Q4 13:11 | 4 | 16 | Punt | 34–14 |
| KC | Q4 11:48 | 7 | 75 | Touchdown | 41–14 |
| LV | Q4 7:39 | 17 | 60 | Turnover on downs | 41–14 |
| KC | Q4 1:45 | 1 | 18 | End of half | 41–14 |
Box score
Individual performances
Chiefs
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Mahomes | 35/50 | 406 | 5 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darrel Williams | 11 | 43 | 3.9 | 0 |
| Jerick McKinnon | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 0 |
| Derrick Gore | 6 | 19 | 3.2 | 0 |
| Blake Bell | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Mecole Hardman | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Tyreek Hill | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 |
| Chad Henne | 2 | -2 | -1.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Travis Kelce | 8 | 10 | 119 | 0 |
| Darrel Williams | 9 | 9 | 101 | 1 |
| Tyreek Hill | 7 | 10 | 83 | 2 |
| Byron Pringle | 4 | 5 | 46 | 1 |
| Mecole Hardman | 2 | 3 | 27 | 0 |
| Demarcus Robinson | 3 | 4 | 23 | 0 |
| Marcus Kemp | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 |
| Jerick McKinnon | 1 | 3 | 6 | 0 |
| Noah Gray | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
Raiders
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derek Carr | 25/35 | 261 | 2 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Derek Carr | 3 | 18 | 6.0 | 0 |
| Kenyan Drake | 4 | 16 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Josh Jacobs | 7 | 16 | 2.3 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bryan Edwards | 3 | 4 | 88 | 1 |
| Hunter Renfrow | 7 | 9 | 46 | 1 |
| DeSean Jackson | 1 | 1 | 38 | 0 |
| Darren Waller | 4 | 7 | 24 | 0 |
| Zay Jones | 1 | 3 | 22 | 0 |
| Josh Jacobs | 5 | 5 | 20 | 0 |
| Kenyan Drake | 2 | 3 | 15 | 0 |
| Jalen Richard | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Raiders; negative favour Chiefs.
Half-point at risk
2.13%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
44.8%
Expected total
46.8est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-3.28
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin-1.57



