Closing spread
LAC -3
Total
41
Model margin
+4.2est.
LAC perspective
Push chance
7.5%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Raiders
- OutDecamerion RichardsonCBHamstring· DNP
- OutJackson Powers-JohnsonGIllness· DNP
- OutMalcolm KoonceDEKnee· DNP
- QuestionableTommy EichenbergLBKnee· Limited
Chargers
- OutD.J. CharkWRHip· DNP
- QuestionableAsante SamuelCBShoulder· Limited
- QuestionableTarheeb StillCBHip· Full
Win probability
- Chargers
- Raiders
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.131EPA / play+0.044
- 41.0%Success rate42.3%
- -0.058EPA / dropback+0.127
- -0.283EPA / rush-0.079
- 7.2%Explosive rate9.2%
- -1.46CPOE+1.69
- 34.2%Third-down rate40.1%
- 57.1%Red-zone TD rate59.6%
- 1.51Points / drive2.25
- 2.6%Turnover rate0.8%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
LAC lead 33–22 since 1999
Meetings average 43.8 points. LAC are 31-23-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | LV–LAC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAC | Q1 15:00 | 5 | 15 | Punt | 0–0 |
| LV | Q1 11:44 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 0–0 |
| LAC | Q1 9:30 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 0–0 |
| LV | Q1 7:31 | 4 | 8 | Turnover on downs | 0–0 |
| LAC | Q1 5:55 | 4 | 15 | Field goal | 0–3 |
| LV | Q1 4:22 | 7 | 67 | Touchdown | 7–3 |
| LAC | Q1 0:45 | 3 | 14 | Punt | 7–3 |
| LV | Q2 14:15 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 7–3 |
| LAC | Q2 12:13 | 4 | 19 | Punt | 7–3 |
| LV | Q2 8:58 | 7 | 19 | Punt | 7–3 |
| LAC | Q2 4:27 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 7–3 |
| LV | Q2 2:09 | 4 | 8 | Turnover | 7–3 |
| LAC | Q2 1:13 | 3 | 5 | Field goal | 7–6 |
| LV | Q2 0:26 | 1 | 4 | End of half | 7–6 |
| LV | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 8 | Punt | 7–6 |
| LAC | Q3 12:53 | 8 | 74 | Field goal | 7–9 |
| LV | Q3 9:08 | 3 | 18 | Turnover | 7–9 |
| LAC | Q3 8:20 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 7–9 |
| LV | Q3 6:47 | 8 | 49 | Missed field goal | 7–9 |
| LAC | Q3 2:02 | 6 | 61 | Touchdown | 7–16 |
| LV | Q4 14:55 | 7 | 56 | Field goal | 10–16 |
| LAC | Q4 10:30 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 10–16 |
| LV | Q4 9:30 | 3 | 9 | Punt | 10–16 |
| LAC | Q4 7:09 | 8 | 92 | Touchdown | 10–22 |
| LV | Q4 3:40 | 7 | 33 | Turnover | 10–22 |
| LAC | Q4 1:44 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 10–22 |
Box score
Individual performances
Raiders
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gardner Minshew | 25/33 | 257 | 1 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zamir White | 13 | 44 | 3.4 | 0 |
| Alexander Mattison | 5 | 19 | 3.8 | 0 |
| Gardner Minshew | 3 | 5 | 1.7 | 0 |
| Jakobi Meyers | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakobi Meyers | 3 | 3 | 61 | 0 |
| Davante Adams | 5 | 6 | 59 | 0 |
| Brock Bowers | 6 | 8 | 58 | 0 |
| Alexander Mattison | 4 | 6 | 43 | 1 |
| Tre Tucker | 2 | 3 | 22 | 0 |
| DJ Turner | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
| Michael Mayer | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Zamir White | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Chargers
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Justin Herbert | 17/26 | 144 | 1 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| J.K. Dobbins | 10 | 135 | 13.5 | 1 |
| Gus Edwards | 11 | 26 | 2.4 | 0 |
| Derius Davis | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 |
| Justin Herbert | 4 | 6 | 1.5 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ladd McConkey | 5 | 7 | 39 | 1 |
| Quentin Johnston | 3 | 5 | 38 | 0 |
| Hayden Hurst | 2 | 3 | 33 | 0 |
| Josh Palmer | 2 | 4 | 15 | 0 |
| Will Dissly | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 |
| J.K. Dobbins | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 |
| Gus Edwards | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Chargers; negative favour Raiders.
Half-point at risk
7.50%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
60.3%
Expected total
43.2est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+2.51
- Home-field advantage+1.71
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+4.21



