Closing spread
BUF -1.5
Total
44.5
Model margin
+1.1est.
HOU perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Bills
- QuestionableJordan HancockCBQuadricep· Full
- QuestionableT.J. SandersDEKnee· Limited
- QuestionableTy JohnsonRBHamstring· Limited
Texans
- DNPKayden McDonaldDTAnkle
- DNPWill Anderson Jr.DENot injury related - resting player
Win probability
- Texans
- Bills
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.210EPA / play+0.031
- 49.2%Success rate43.4%
- +0.338EPA / dropback+0.138
- +0.031EPA / rush-0.167
- 13.6%Explosive rate8.4%
- +4.89CPOE+2.27
- 48.3%Third-down rate37.8%
- 70.0%Red-zone TD rate60.4%
- 3.19Points / drive2.19
- 2.4%Turnover rate0.7%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
HOU lead 8–6 since 1999
Meetings average 41.4 points. HOU are 7-6-1 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | BUF–HOU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUF | Q1 15:00 | 7 | 30 | Turnover on downs | 0–0 |
| HOU | Q1 11:15 | 3 | 1 | Turnover | 0–0 |
| BUF | Q1 9:32 | 3 | 9 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| HOU | Q1 7:28 | 12 | 76 | Touchdown | 3–7 |
| BUF | Q1 0:32 | 7 | 67 | Touchdown | 10–7 |
| HOU | Q2 12:46 | 15 | 65 | Touchdown | 10–14 |
| BUF | Q2 4:48 | 4 | 19 | Touchdown | 17–14 |
| HOU | Q2 3:59 | 4 | 8 | Punt | 17–14 |
| BUF | Q2 2:10 | 3 | 96 | Touchdown | 24–14 |
| HOU | Q2 1:29 | 5 | 65 | Touchdown | 24–21 |
| BUF | Q2 0:26 | 2 | 3 | End of half | 24–21 |
| HOU | Q3 15:00 | 4 | 5 | Punt | 24–21 |
| BUF | Q3 13:10 | 7 | 29 | Punt | 24–21 |
| HOU | Q3 9:26 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 24–21 |
| BUF | Q3 7:58 | 6 | 12 | Field goal | 27–21 |
| HOU | Q3 4:24 | 13 | 72 | Touchdown | 27–28 |
| BUF | Q4 13:34 | 6 | 52 | Field goal | 30–28 |
| HOU | Q4 10:31 | 7 | 36 | Field goal | 30–31 |
| BUF | Q4 6:44 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 30–31 |
| HOU | Q4 5:39 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 30–31 |
| BUF | Q4 3:13 | 7 | 93 | Touchdown | 36–31 |
| HOU | Q4 1:36 | 10 | 47 | Turnover | 36–31 |
| BUF | Q4 0:09 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 36–31 |
Box score
Individual performances
Bills
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Allen | 20/29 | 334 | 2 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Cook | 13 | 57 | 4.4 | 0 |
| Josh Allen | 6 | 23 | 3.8 | 2 |
| Frank Gore Jr. | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Ray Davis | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dalton Kincaid | 5 | 6 | 130 | 0 |
| DJ Moore | 5 | 8 | 100 | 1 |
| Khalil Shakir | 4 | 6 | 50 | 0 |
| Josh Palmer | 1 | 2 | 34 | 1 |
| James Cook | 3 | 4 | 12 | 0 |
| Dawson Knox | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Keon Coleman | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Texans
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.J. Stroud | 26/38 | 274 | 2 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Montgomery | 20 | 60 | 3.0 | 2 |
| Woody Marks | 9 | 42 | 4.7 | 0 |
| C.J. Stroud | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 0 |
| Nico Collins | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nico Collins | 7 | 10 | 75 | 1 |
| Jaylin Noel | 2 | 2 | 53 | 0 |
| Dalton Schultz | 4 | 8 | 35 | 0 |
| Xavier Hutchinson | 3 | 6 | 32 | 0 |
| Kayshon Boutte | 1 | 2 | 21 | 0 |
| David Montgomery | 3 | 3 | 19 | 1 |
| Marlin Klein | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 |
| Foster Moreau | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 |
| Jared Wayne | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 |
| Cade Stover | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
| Woody Marks | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Texans; negative favour Bills.
Half-point at risk
2.14%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
52.0%
Expected total
46.4est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.14
- Home-field advantage+2.22
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+1.08



