Closing spread
BUF -5.5
Total
53.5
Model margin
-0.5est.
LV perspective
Push chance
None
half-point line — cannot push
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Bills
- QuestionableDee AlfordCBAnkle· Limited
- QuestionableDJ MooreWRShoulder· Limited
- QuestionableEd OliverDEKnee· Limited
- QuestionableJosh PalmerWRShoulder· Limited
- QuestionableT.J. SandersDEShoulder· Full
- LimitedTerrel BernardLBKnee
Raiders
- OutCarter RunyonTEFoot· Limited
- OutDont'e Thornton Jr.WRHamstring· Full
- OutTonka HemingwayDTConcussion· DNP
- QuestionableTrey Zuhn IIICKnee· Limited
Win probability
- Raiders
- Bills
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.175EPA / play+0.046
- 49.0%Success rate44.0%
- +0.296EPA / dropback+0.212
- +0.013EPA / rush-0.233
- 12.5%Explosive rate7.5%
- +3.91CPOE+0.10
- 44.9%Third-down rate43.3%
- 71.7%Red-zone TD rate60.7%
- 3.13Points / drive2.60
- 2.4%Turnover rate1.2%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
All square 6–6 since 1999
BUF have won 4 straight. Meetings average 53 points. LV are 8-4 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | BUF–LV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUF | Q1 15:00 | 8 | 30 | Field goal | 3–0 |
| LV | Q1 10:12 | 10 | 64 | Touchdown | 3–7 |
| BUF | Q1 4:27 | 9 | 63 | Field goal | 6–7 |
| LV | Q2 14:45 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 6–7 |
| BUF | Q2 13:01 | 10 | 90 | Touchdown | 13–7 |
| LV | Q2 7:13 | 9 | 61 | Field goal | 13–10 |
| BUF | Q2 2:14 | 3 | -7 | Punt | 13–10 |
| LV | Q2 1:40 | 8 | 39 | Field goal | 13–13 |
| LV | Q3 15:00 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 13–13 |
| BUF | Q3 14:25 | 9 | 47 | Field goal | 16–13 |
| LV | Q3 9:45 | 2 | -2 | Turnover | 16–13 |
| BUF | Q3 8:54 | 8 | 14 | Touchdown | 23–13 |
| LV | Q3 6:22 | 16 | 75 | Field goal | 23–16 |
| BUF | Q4 13:32 | 4 | 16 | Punt | 23–16 |
| LV | Q4 11:56 | 9 | 91 | Touchdown | 23–23 |
| BUF | Q4 8:07 | 7 | 66 | Touchdown | 30–23 |
| LV | Q4 4:43 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 30–23 |
| BUF | Q4 4:08 | 7 | 29 | Field goal | 33–23 |
| LV | Q4 1:56 | 3 | 44 | Touchdown | 33–30 |
| BUF | Q4 1:32 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 33–30 |
Box score
Individual performances
Bills
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Allen | 23/33 | 255 | 2 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Cook | 22 | 95 | 4.3 | 1 |
| Ray Davis | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Ty Johnson | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 |
| Josh Allen | 5 | 1 | 0.2 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keon Coleman | 4 | 6 | 59 | 1 |
| James Cook | 3 | 3 | 58 | 0 |
| Dalton Kincaid | 7 | 8 | 38 | 0 |
| Josh Palmer | 1 | 2 | 37 | 0 |
| Khalil Shakir | 4 | 6 | 34 | 1 |
| Ty Johnson | 2 | 2 | 24 | 0 |
| Ray Davis | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Dawson Knox | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Skyler Bell | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Raiders
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirk Cousins | 23/41 | 313 | 2 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Washington Jr. | 9 | 43 | 4.8 | 0 |
| Ashton Jeanty | 10 | 22 | 2.2 | 1 |
| Dylan Laube | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tre Tucker | 5 | 7 | 97 | 2 |
| Michael Mayer | 7 | 9 | 95 | 0 |
| Brock Bowers | 4 | 9 | 70 | 0 |
| Ashton Jeanty | 4 | 6 | 36 | 0 |
| Jalen Nailor | 1 | 4 | 9 | 0 |
| Mike Washington Jr. | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Cody White | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Dylan Laube | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Raiders; negative favour Bills.
Half-point at risk
1.87%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
47.8%
Expected total
46.2est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-2.78
- Home-field advantage+2.22
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential+0.08
- Expected margin-0.48



