Closing spread
CHI -3
Total
50.5
Model margin
+2.0est.
CHI perspective
Push chance
7.5%est.
the line sits on a key number
Availability
The injury report
The official league filing for this week — game designations first, then who missed or was limited in practice.
Patriots
- OutAlijah Vera-TuckerGHamstring· DNP
- OutBen BrownCKnee· DNP
- OutCarlton Davis IIICBNeck· Limited
- OutChanning CanadaCBHamstring· Limited
- OutKaron PruntyCBHamstring· Limited
- QuestionableChristian EllissLBChest· Full
- QuestionableChristian GonzalezCBIllness
- QuestionableCraig WoodsonSShoulder· Full
- QuestionableKevin ByardSChest· Full
- QuestionableMorgan MosesTFoot· Limited
Bears
- OutJack SanbornLBConcussion· DNP
- OutKyle MonangaiRBThumb· DNP
- DoubtfulT.J. EdwardsLBHamstring· Limited
- QuestionableTyrique StevensonCBHip· Full
Win probability
- Bears
- Patriots
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- +0.057EPA / play+0.052
- 45.5%Success rate47.0%
- +0.214EPA / dropback+0.154
- -0.169EPA / rush-0.082
- 8.7%Explosive rate9.6%
- +7.72CPOE+5.30
- 41.4%Third-down rate44.6%
- 62.7%Red-zone TD rate51.9%
- 2.07Points / drive2.27
- 3.0%Turnover rate2.1%
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
NE lead 6–3 since 1999
Meetings average 49.2 points. CHI are 5-4 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | NE–CHI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NE | Q1 15:00 | 7 | 33 | Turnover on downs | 0–0 |
| CHI | Q1 11:30 | 4 | 29 | Field goal | 0–3 |
| NE | Q1 9:53 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 0–3 |
| CHI | Q1 8:17 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 0–3 |
| NE | Q1 5:46 | 3 | 1 | Punt | 0–3 |
| CHI | Q1 3:38 | 5 | 74 | Touchdown | 0–10 |
| NE | Q1 1:38 | 9 | 68 | Touchdown | 7–10 |
| CHI | Q2 11:33 | 8 | 35 | Field goal | 7–13 |
| NE | Q2 7:04 | 6 | 53 | Turnover | 7–13 |
| CHI | Q2 3:25 | 11 | 70 | Touchdown | 7–20 |
| NE | Q2 0:14 | 2 | 66 | Touchdown | 14–20 |
| CHI | Q3 15:00 | 10 | 82 | Touchdown | 14–27 |
| NE | Q3 9:41 | 10 | 90 | Touchdown | 21–27 |
| CHI | Q3 3:46 | 3 | 2 | Punt | 21–27 |
| NE | Q3 2:50 | 4 | 27 | Punt | 21–27 |
| CHI | Q4 14:53 | 13 | 56 | Missed field goal | 21–27 |
| NE | Q4 7:57 | 3 | 3 | Punt | 21–27 |
| CHI | Q4 6:22 | 11 | 55 | Field goal | 21–30 |
| NE | Q4 1:34 | 5 | 33 | Field goal | 24–30 |
| CHI | Q4 0:37 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 24–30 |
Box score
Individual performances
Patriots
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drake Maye | 24/31 | 321 | 2 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drake Maye | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 1 |
| Rhamondre Stevenson | 6 | 22 | 3.7 | 0 |
| Corey Kiner | 4 | 13 | 3.3 | 0 |
| TreVeyon Henderson | 3 | 9 | 3.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhamondre Stevenson | 5 | 5 | 93 | 1 |
| Hunter Henry | 7 | 7 | 71 | 0 |
| Eli Raridon | 3 | 4 | 56 | 1 |
| A.J. Brown | 3 | 6 | 48 | 0 |
| DeMario Douglas | 3 | 4 | 23 | 0 |
| Efton Chism III | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 |
| TreVeyon Henderson | 2 | 2 | 14 | 0 |
| Kyle Williams | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bears
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caleb Williams | 22/33 | 308 | 2 | 0 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| D'Andre Swift | 22 | 78 | 3.5 | 1 |
| Caleb Williams | 5 | 18 | 3.6 | 0 |
| Roschon Johnson | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 0 |
| Luther Burden III | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 |
Receiving
| Player | Rec | Tgt | Yds | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luther Burden III | 4 | 4 | 130 | 1 |
| Rome Odunze | 4 | 5 | 69 | 0 |
| Colston Loveland | 7 | 12 | 69 | 1 |
| Cole Kmet | 3 | 3 | 28 | 0 |
| D'Andre Swift | 4 | 4 | 12 | 0 |
| Kalif Raymond | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Bears; negative favour Patriots.
Half-point at risk
7.50%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
54.4%
Expected total
45.4est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-0.25
- Home-field advantage+2.22
- Quarterback adjustment0.00
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+1.97



