2026 · Week 9

Scheduled

Texans

Houston

QB C.J. Stroud

—@—

Chargers

Los Angeles

QB Justin Herbert

SoFi Stadium · dome · matrixturf

Closing spread

HOU -4.5

Total

40.5

Model margin

-0.3est.

LAC perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Texansedge mapChargers
  • +0.031EPA / play-0.231
  • 43.4%Success rate35.9%
  • +0.138EPA / dropback-0.210
  • -0.167EPA / rush-0.262
  • 8.4%Explosive rate6.8%
  • +2.27CPOE-4.44
  • 37.8%Third-down rate34.6%
  • 60.4%Red-zone TD rate51.4%
  • 2.19Points / drive1.17
  • 0.7%Turnover rate3.5%

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

LAC lead 6–5 since 1999

HOU have won 2 straight. Meetings average 47.2 points. LAC are 7-4 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W17HOU @ LAC20–16HOU
2024 · playoffsLAC @ HOU12–32HOU
2022 · W4LAC @ HOU34–24CHARGERS
2021 · W16LAC @ HOU29–41HOU
2019 · W3HOU @ LAC27–20HOU
2016 · W12SD @ HOU21–13CHARGERS
2013 · W1HOU @ SD31–28HOU
2010 · W9SD @ HOU29–23CHARGERS

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line -4.52.7%4.5%2.9%7.4%7.3%2.9%4.4%2.7%

Positive margins favour Chargers; negative favour Texans.

Half-point at risk

2.46%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

48.2%

Expected total

43.0est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.97
  • Home-field advantage+2.22
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-0.56
  • Expected margin-0.31