2002 · Week 13

Final

Jets

New York

QB Chad Pennington

20·26

Raiders

Oakland

QB Rich Gannon

Network Associates Coliseum · outdoors · grass · 57°F · wind 7mph

Closing spread

OAK -6

Total

47.5

Model margin

+0.9est.

OAK perspective

Push chance

3.0%est.

the line sits on a key number

Win probability

  • Raiders
  • Jets

How each play moved the game.

Raiders winsJets wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

The rivalry

OAK lead 11–8 since 1999

RAIDERS have won 2 straight. Meetings average 45.1 points. OAK are 9-8-2 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2023 · W10NYJ @ LV1216RAIDERS
2020 · W13LV @ NYJ3128RAIDERS
2019 · W12OAK @ NYJ334NYJ
2017 · W2NYJ @ OAK2045RAIDERS
2015 · W8NYJ @ OAK2034RAIDERS
2014 · W1OAK @ NYJ1419NYJ
2013 · W14OAK @ NYJ2737NYJ
2011 · W3NYJ @ OAK2434RAIDERS

Box score

Individual performances

Jets

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Chad Pennington22/3426521

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Curtis Martin11262.40
Chad Pennington133.00
LaMont Jordan100.00

Receiving

PlayerRecTgtYdsTD
Laveranues Coles10131580
Wayne Chrebet57661
LaMont Jordan33240
Curtis Martin22110
Kevin Swayne0300
Santana Moss0100

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +64.3%2.8%7.2%7.4%3.0%4.5%2.8%

Positive margins favour Raiders; negative favour Jets.

Half-point at risk

3.00%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

51.6%

Expected total

46.1est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-1.63
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential0.00
  • Expected margin+0.93

One or both ratings are carry-over priors — no games have been played this season yet, so treat this as a starting assumption rather than a read.