Closing spread
NE -5
Total
37
Model margin
+0.5est.
HOU perspective
Push chance
1.8%est.
Win probability
- Texans
- Patriots
How each play moved the game.
Matchup
Where the edges are
Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.
- -0.043EPA / play-0.099
- 40.7%Success rate38.7%
- +0.048EPA / dropback-0.096
- -0.161EPA / rush-0.102
- 7.5%Explosive rate9.0%
- 37.4%Third-down rate30.8%
- 47.0%Red-zone TD rate65.8%
- 1.42Points / drive1.15
- 2.2%Turnover rate2.8%
- -0.159EPA / play allowed+0.041
Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.
The rivalry
NE lead 12–4 since 1999
Meetings average 51.1 points. HOU are 7-9 ATS in the series.
Possession by possession
How it unfolded
Every drive: who had the ball, how far it went, how it ended, and the score as it settled.
| Ball | Start | Plays | Yards | Result | NE–HOU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOU | Q1 15:00 | 3 | 0 | Punt | 0–0 |
| NE | Q1 12:46 | 3 | -1 | Punt | 0–0 |
| HOU | Q1 11:17 | 12 | 56 | Field goal | 0–3 |
| NE | Q1 2:36 | 10 | 67 | Touchdown | 7–3 |
| HOU | Q2 13:12 | 3 | -1 | Punt | 7–3 |
| NE | Q2 11:33 | 6 | 38 | Turnover | 7–3 |
| NE | Q2 7:57 | 3 | 9 | Field goal | 10–3 |
| HOU | Q2 5:55 | 3 | 6 | Punt | 10–3 |
| NE | Q2 4:40 | 7 | 27 | Punt | 10–3 |
| HOU | Q2 1:44 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 10–3 |
| NE | Q2 0:58 | 5 | 37 | Missed field goal | 10–3 |
| HOU | Q2 0:01 | 0 | 0 | End of half | 10–3 |
| NE | Q3 15:00 | 11 | 42 | Turnover on downs | 10–3 |
| HOU | Q3 8:41 | 5 | 15 | Punt | 10–3 |
| NE | Q3 6:26 | 6 | 25 | Turnover | 10–3 |
| HOU | Q3 4:33 | 2 | 11 | Touchdown | 10–10 |
| NE | Q3 4:01 | 8 | 56 | Field goal | 13–10 |
| HOU | Q4 14:57 | 3 | -2 | Punt | 13–10 |
| NE | Q4 13:10 | 7 | 22 | Turnover | 13–10 |
| HOU | Q4 8:59 | 5 | 36 | Touchdown | 13–17 |
| NE | Q4 6:49 | 3 | 5 | Punt | 13–17 |
| HOU | Q4 4:50 | 3 | 8 | Field goal | 13–20 |
| NE | Q4 3:11 | 9 | 80 | Touchdown | 20–20 |
| HOU | Q4 0:40 | 2 | 8 | End of half | 20–20 |
| HOU | OT | 1 | 0 | Turnover | 20–20 |
| NE | OT | 3 | 4 | Missed field goal | 20–20 |
| HOU | OT | 9 | 33 | Punt | 20–20 |
| NE | OT | 3 | -5 | Punt | 20–20 |
| HOU | OT | 3 | -5 | Punt | 20–20 |
| NE | OT | 10 | 66 | Field goal | 23–20 |
Box score
Individual performances
Patriots
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Brady | 29/47 | 368 | 2 | 2 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kevin Faulk | 23 | 80 | 3.5 | 0 |
| Patrick Pass | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 0 |
| Tom Brady | 6 | 15 | 2.5 | 0 |
| Antowain Smith | 8 | 10 | 1.3 | 0 |
| Mike Cloud | 2 | 8 | 4.0 | 0 |
Texans
Passing
| Player | C/Att | Yds | TD | INT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tony Banks | 10/25 | 93 | 2 | 1 |
Rushing
| Player | Car | Yds | Avg | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domanick Williams | 24 | 69 | 2.9 | 0 |
| Jabar Gaffney | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 |
| Tony Banks | 2 | 5 | 2.5 | 0 |
| Andre Johnson | 2 | 3 | 1.5 | 0 |
| Tony Hollings | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 |
Where this game is likely to land
- Model
- Smooth (normal)
- Betting line
Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.
Positive margins favour Texans; negative favour Patriots.
Half-point at risk
1.83%
outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5
Model home win
50.4%
Expected total
42.4est.
Model
Where the number comes from
Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.
- Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)-4.20
- Home-field advantage+2.56
- Quarterback adjustment+2.13
- Rest differential0.00
- Expected margin+0.49



