2004 · Week 2

Final

Dolphins

Miami

QB A.J. Feeley

13·16

Bengals

Cincinnati

QB Carson Palmer

Paul Brown Stadium · outdoors · fieldturf · 72°F · wind 9mph

Closing spread

CIN -5.5

Total

40

Model margin

+4.0est.

CIN perspective

Push chance

None

half-point line — cannot push

Win probability

  • Bengals
  • Dolphins

How each play moved the game.

Bengals winsDolphins wins

Matchup

Where the edges are

Season-long league percentiles for both sides, mirrored. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge.

Dolphinsedge mapBengals
  • -0.173EPA / play-0.059
  • 35.8%Success rate43.2%
  • -0.181EPA / dropback-0.020
  • -0.159EPA / rush-0.114
  • 6.9%Explosive rate8.8%
  • 34.6%Third-down rate40.8%
  • 56.0%Red-zone TD rate53.2%
  • 0.97Points / drive1.40
  • 3.7%Turnover rate3.1%
  • -0.054EPA / play allowed-0.048

Bar length is league percentile, already oriented so longer is better. The saturated side of a lopsided row holds the edge; rows within ~12 points are washed as even.

The rivalry

All square 6–6 since 1999

CIN have won 2 straight. Meetings average 43.9 points. CIN are 5-7 ATS in the series.

Previous meetings
SeasonMatchupScoreWinner
2025 · W16CIN @ MIA4521CIN
2022 · W4MIA @ CIN1527CIN
2020 · W13CIN @ MIA719MIA
2019 · W16CIN @ MIA3538MIA
2018 · W5MIA @ CIN1727CIN
2016 · W4MIA @ CIN722CIN
2013 · W9CIN @ MIA2022MIA
2012 · W5MIA @ CIN1713MIA

Box score

Individual performances

Dolphins

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
A.J. Feeley21/3921812

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Lamar Gordon19221.20
A.J. Feeley133.00

Bengals

Passing

PlayerC/AttYdsTDINT
Carson Palmer21/3814701

Rushing

PlayerCarYdsAvgTD
Rudi Johnson22673.00
T.J. Houshmandzadeh11111.00
Kenny Watson492.30
Peter Warrick166.00

Where this game is likely to land

  • Model
  • Smooth (normal)
  • Betting line

Probability of each final margin. Football scoring clusters — the spikes at 3 and 7 are real, and a smooth model misses them.

line +5.53.7%6.7%7.5%3.2%4.9%3.2%2.9%

Positive margins favour Bengals; negative favour Dolphins.

Half-point at risk

3.17%

outcomes that flip if the line moves 0.5

Model home win

59.7%

Expected total

41.8est.

Model

Where the number comes from

Each component is additive, in points of expected margin.

  • Team ratings (opponent-adjusted EPA)+1.51
  • Home-field advantage+2.56
  • Quarterback adjustment0.00
  • Rest differential-0.08
  • Expected margin+3.99